Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

4/1/2015
05:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Laziok Trojan Exploits Three Year-Old Windows Flaw

Data-stealing malware relies on old bug to break into systems at energy companies.

Despite all the attention paid to zero-day bugs and sophisticated new attack techniques, criminal hackers often exploit old vulnerabilities where they can in order to gain access to an enterprise network or system.

The latest case in point is Trojan Laziok, a malware tool that exploits a three-year old Windows vulnerability to gain access to systems belonging to energy companies in the Middle East and, to a lesser extent, other regions of the world. Roughly 10 percent of the malware’s victims are based in the US and UK.

Security researchers at Symantec described the malware as a reconnaissance tool that allows attackers to gather data from compromised computers and use the information to make decisions on whether to carry out or drop further attacks against the systems.

Laziok is designed to collect system configuration data such as computer name, installed software, memory, hard disk size, and type of antivirus software installed on the system.

It is also designed to drop customized copies of Backdoor. Cyberat and Trojan.Zbot, two well-known data stealers, on systems that are identified by the attackers as being worthy of further compromise. “We observed that the threats were downloaded from a few servers operating in the US, UK, and Bulgaria,” Symantec security researcher Christian Tripputi said in the blog post describing the Trojan.

Companies targeted by the Trojan were mostly in the petroleum, gas, and helium industries, suggesting that the attackers have a strategic interest in the energy sector, Tripputi said.

What makes Laziok interesting is that it exploits a software flaw for which a patch was available back in 2012, says security researcher Satnam Narang.

Laziok arrives as a malicious attachment in spam emails purporting to be from the moneytran.eu domain. The attachment contains an exploit for a remote, code execution vulnerability in a Windows ActiveX Control.

The flaw was first disclosed three years ago in April 2012 and was patched shortly thereafter. It was exploited in multiple previous attack campaigns including Red October, a sophisticated cyberespionage campaign against numerous government, diplomatic, and research organizations worldwide.

Despite the attention focused the flaw, Laziok has shown that many organizations have yet to patch against it, Narang said.

“Zero-days are considered the jewels of the pack,” Narang says. “But in this case [the attackers] are using an outdated vulnerability that has been already patched.”

It underscores how criminal hackers, when developing exploits for new campaigns, have an expectation that a lot of people are going to be running unpatched software, he says. While zero-day exploits are much more valuable from a hacker standpoint they are also more costly to discover and use than attacks targeting older flaws. So cyber criminals have a tendency to exploit old flaws where they can, Narang said.

The Laziok campaign shows why attack tools and exploits matter less than victim targeting and the economics of the attack campaign, said Philip Lieberman, president of Lieberman Software.

“Just as a company looks at the ROI of their offerings, attackers attempt to use the most inexpensive tools possible to achieve the greatest ROI,” he said in emailed comments. The attack takes advantage of the failure by many organizations in the oil and gas industry to keep their Windows software environment properly patched, he said.

“The attack points out the lack of general preparation of cyber-defense teams in many areas of the oil and gas industry worldwide.”

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.