Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

6/21/2011
05:52 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

IT Pros Lose Sleep Over Spyware, Not APT

eEye survey finds most IT admins, managers, and C-level executives consider Stuxnet, Operation Aurora, and other high-profile targeted threats 'minor' concerns

The headlines might scream "advanced persistent threat," Stuxnet, and Operation Aurora, but the typical business spends more time worrying about more mundane threats like spyware and fake antivirus, a new study shows.

Half of the 1,600 IT administrators and managers and C-level executives surveyed from various industries and government agencies in eEye Digital Security's new “2011 Headlines vs. Reality” study say that traditional malware and spyware is the No. 1 threat to their organizations, while 60 percent consider the infamous targeted attacks in Stuxnet, Operation Aurora, and Night Dragon as minor threats.

"It was interesting that more than half of the people surveyed are still spending the majority of their time from a security perspective battling common spyware and fake AV versus targeted attacks," says eEye founder and CTO Marc Maiffret.

But some of them might not know they have been hit by a targeted attack, he notes. "Only 12 percent were identifying with Stuxnet, Aurora," and other targeted attacks, Maiffret says.

Nearly 50 percent of the respondents worry about a lack of manpower and technological resources; 42 percent, about improper configurations; 42 percent, about their organization's inability to defend against zero-day attacks; and 41 percent, about the lack of security insight in compliance, vulnerabilities, and attacks.

The survey also asked how security professionals would spend a 20 percent increase in their budgets. Security reporting and dashboard technologies were at the top of the list with 65 percent; patch management was close behind, with 63 percent, followed by configuration compliance, with 60 percent. Half said they would add more staffers, and 39 percent said they would beef up regulatory compliance reporting.

"But the sad reality is that more than half haven't had any budget increases," Maiffret says, citing other findings in the report. Around 57 percent say their IT security budgets remained flat in 2011, while 21 percent saw an increase. And 22 percent say their budgets declined.

"They are doing more with less," Maiffret says.

A full copy of the eEye report is available here for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8096
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-07
Untrusted Search Path vulnerability in Bitdefender High-Level Antimalware SDK for Windows allows an attacker to load third party code from a DLL library in the search path. This issue affects: Bitdefender High-Level Antimalware SDK for Windows versions prior to 3.0.1.204 .
CVE-2020-11586
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-06
An XXE issue was discovered in CIPPlanner CIPAce 9.1 Build 2019092801. An unauthenticated attacker can make an API request that contains malicious XML DTD data.
CVE-2020-11587
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-06
An issue was discovered in CIPPlanner CIPAce 9.1 Build 2019092801. An unauthenticated attacker can make an API request and get the content of ETL Processes running on the server.
CVE-2020-11589
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-06
An Insecure Direct Object Reference issue was discovered in CIPPlanner CIPAce 9.1 Build 2019092801. An unauthenticated attacker can make a GET request to a certain URL and obtain information that should be provided to authenticated users only.
CVE-2020-11590
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-06
An issue was discovered in CIPPlanner CIPAce 9.1 Build 2019092801. An unauthenticated attacker can make an HTTP GET request to HealthPage.aspx and obtain the internal server name.