Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

11/17/2014
03:26 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Is Rogue IT Really A Problem?

Rogue IT may be a misnomer for the subtleties of IT security's involvement in cloud procurement.

As much as security vendors and others promote the idea of there being a massive problem of rogue IT in the enterprise, analysts with CompTIA argue that the way most organizations procure their cloud services is anything but rogue.

"Rogue IT has been a big topic, but in our data we don't see that many companies that have a line of business that's trying to avoid the IT department completely," says Seth Robinson, senior director of technology analysis at CompTIA and principal author of a report published recently that supports his argument, the "5th Annual Trends in Cloud Computing."

The report showed that between 18% and 36% of cloud applications are purchased by line-of-business buyers. However, only 12% of companies report that these buyers don't consult with the IT department at all or allow them to give final approval on cloud purchases. What's more, that number is going down.

Not only are most line of businesses not really trying to circumvent IT, but generally the line-of-business practice of directly subscribing to cloud services is approved and encouraged by the upper echelons of management if it'll help the bottom line. That doesn't mean there aren't security issues around cloud procurement, just that the discussion might need to be reframed. "Rogue" implies negative connotations for an already approved behavior, when the practice could be more accurately described as decentralization. It may seem like a trivial matter of semantics, but just the use of a negative word to describe line-of-business' involvement in buying cloud belies the typical cloud buyer's intention when it comes to involving IT security in the process.

According to Robinson, most enterprises have already learned from early cloud purchase mistakes and their line-of-business leaders actually crave some kind of IT involvement in the process.

"What's happened in fairly short order is that when the line-of-business didn't inform IT of what they were doing, they would run into integration or security issues," he says, explaining that companies have increasingly learned that these are IT issues and require IT input. "Companies are starting to realize that you have to have the IT team there because they've got some specialized knowledge and experience and know what to look out for."

For example, says Robinson, line-of-business leaders know they need to evaluate vendors based on security but also realize that they don't have the knowledge to ask the depth of questions necessary to truly look out for pitfalls.

The question, of course, is whether security and IT operations staff really willing to meet line-of-business partners halfway when designing cloud procurement and governance guidelines that make sense. According to CompTIA, most line-of-business departments and managers seem to actively look to IT for consultation and help in buying the best cloud solutions for their business needs. But the same doesn't seem to be true in reverse. A survey out today by the Cloud Service Alliance and Skyhigh Networks shows that among the 35% of enterprises that have a cloud governance committee, fewer than half contain representatives from lines of business.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ternantech01
50%
50%
ternantech01,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/18/2014 | 7:21:11 AM
IT is not always right ..
Erika,

Per your comment -

""line-of-business leaders know they need to evaluate vendors based on security but also realize that they don't have the knowledge to ask the depth of questions necessary to truly look out for pitfalls"

What happens when the IT department does not have the knowledge to ask the right questions either? This could lead to a disjointed cloud service being purchased that cannot be supported by the either the LOB or IT organization. When this happens, then the LOB would be forced to find alternatives to help support their cloud services which were purchased outside of the IT department.

I realize that many LOB's utilize cloud services outside of IT organizations line of sight. I for one am not a advocate of this type of IT strategy, as it tends to create more problems in the long term than it solves.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Healthcare Industry Sees Respite From Attacks in First Half of 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  8/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: It's a technique known as breaking out of the sandbox kids.
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20383
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
ABBYY network license server in ABBYY FineReader 15 before Release 4 (aka 15.0.112.2130) allows escalation of privileges by local users via manipulations involving files and using symbolic links.
CVE-2020-24348
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, has an out-of-bounds read in njs_json_stringify_iterator in njs_json.c.
CVE-2020-24349
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, allows control-flow hijack in njs_value_property in njs_value.c. NOTE: the vendor considers the issue to be "fluff" in the NGINX use case because there is no remote attack surface.
CVE-2020-7360
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427) vulnerability in SmartControl version 4.3.15 and versions released before April 15, 2020 may allow an authenticated user to escalate privileges by placing a specially crafted DLL file in the search path. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7, which was r...
CVE-2020-24342
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Lua through 5.4.0 allows a stack redzone cross in luaO_pushvfstring because a protection mechanism wrongly calls luaD_callnoyield twice in a row.