Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

Guest Blog // Selected Security Content Provided By Sophos
What's This?
5/11/2010
06:29 AM
Graham Cluley
Graham Cluley
Security Insights
50%
50%

Is KHOBE An Earthquake Or A Storm In A Security Teacup?

Should you be losing sleep over a report that claims Windows antivirus products are fatally flawed?

Should you be losing sleep over a report that claims Windows antivirus products are fatally flawed?If you just believed the headlines, then you would be forgiven for thinking there's a serious problem:

KHOBE media headlines

Sounds bad, doesn't it? These news headlines have come in the wake of a new report from a firm called Matousec, which claims "today's most popular security solutions simply do not work."

The attack method, dubbed KHOBE and described by Matousec researchers as an "8.0 earthquake for desktop security software," describes a way in which the tamper protection implemented by some anti-malware products might be potentially bypassed.

That's assuming, of course, you can get your malicious code past the anti-malware product in the first place.

Hang on a minute. That means KHOBE is not really a way that hackers can avoid detection and get their malware installed on your computer.

What Matousec is describing is a way of "doing something extra" if the malicious code manages to get past your antivirus software in the first place.

In other words, KHOBE is only an issue if antivirus products miss the malware. And that's one of the reasons, of course, why vendors offer a layered approach using a variety of protection technologies.

It seems to me that the sky isn't falling, and this is a storm in a teacup.

If you want to reassure your bosses that it's not time to throw your Windows security software in the garbage heap just yet, then make sure you read this excellent piece by Sophos's Paul Ducklin, which examines and discusses the KHOBE claims in greater detail.

Graham Cluley is senior technology consultant at Sophos, and has been working in the computer security field since the early 1990s. When he's not updating his award-winning other blog on the Sophos website, you can find him on Twitter at @gcluley. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16772
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-07
The serialize-to-js NPM package before version 3.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS). It does not properly mitigate against unsafe characters in serialized regular expressions. This vulnerability is not affected on Node.js environment since Node.js's implementation of RegExp.prototype.to...
CVE-2019-9464
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In various functions of RecentLocationApps.java, DevicePolicyManagerService.java, and RecognitionService.java, there is an incorrect warning indicating an app accessed the user's location. This could dissolve the trust in the platform's permission system, with no additional execution privileges need...
CVE-2019-2220
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In checkOperation of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible bypass of user interaction requirements due to mishandling application suspend. This could lead to local information disclosure no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVers...
CVE-2019-2221
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In hasActivityInVisibleTask of WindowProcessController.java there?s a possible bypass of user interaction requirements due to incorrect handling of top activities in INITIALIZING state. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction ...
CVE-2019-2222
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
n ihevcd_parse_slice_data of ihevcd_parse_slice.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android...