Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
6/26/2019
05:30 PM
50%
50%

New Linux Worm Attacks IoT Devices

Silex has 'bricked' more than 2,000 Linux-based IoT devices so far.

A new Internet of Things (IoT) bricking worm — malware designed to permanently disable the hardware it infects — is hitting Linux-based devices, and it appears the culprit responsible for the attack is 14 years old. 

The new software, dubbed "Silex," is running across the Internet looking for Linux systems deployed with default admin credentials. Once it finds such a system, it overwrites all of the system's storage with random data, drops its firewall rules, removes its network configuration, and then restarts the system — effectively rendering the device useless.

Discovered by Larry Cashdollar, a vulnerability researcher and member of Akamai's Security Incident Response Team, the software is purely destructive; it captures no data and asks for no ransom. Researcher Ankit Anubhav traced the malware back to its origins and found the developer, who uses the online name "Light Leafon." According to Anubhav, the malware's author says that additional destructive capabilities are planned for future Silex variants.

More than 2,000 systems have already been damaged by Silex, which is not technically limited to IoT devices. It could attack any Linux system deployed on the Internet with open telnet ports and default admin credentials. Other researchers have noted that the command-and-control servers for Silex have IP addresses linked to Iran, leading some to speculate that political, as well as simply destructive, aims are behind its release.

Read more herehere, and here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/30/2019 | 9:02:42 AM
Re: Defaults
That's depressing.
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2019 | 8:34:21 PM
Re: Defaults
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2019 | 8:16:53 PM
Re: Defaults
Definitely concur here. But obviously there are still those out there who are foolish enough for this to still be effective. :( Its quite sad.
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 8:46:28 PM
Re: For fun
"the software is purely destructive; it captures no data and asks for no ransom. Researcher Ankit Anubhav traced the malware back to its origins and found the developer, who uses the online name "Light Leafon." " Obviously this was for fun. Distraction is huge.

I am not so sure it was all for fun, I think it was also being used to test its capability for another purpose. Think about this, if the actor could access systems with default passwords, then what about writing a hash algorithm to run a for loop to check for possible password combinations.
  1. Check to see if they can get to the device and apply a default username and password
  2. Create a payload or add a function statement that goes through a list of passwords

I think this is a logical step in their next attempt but again we are theorizing, only time will tell.
import getpass
import sys
import telnetlib
import time

#Getting the user information
user=input("Enter User name: ")
password=getpass.getpass()

#open file
iplist=open("ipfile.txt")

#Loop through IP address and execute commands
for line in  iplist:

 Host=line.strip("\n")    
 print ("Configuring Switch",Host)
 tn = telnetlib.Telnet(Host)    
 tn.read_until(b"Username: ")   
 tn.write(user.encode('ascii') + b"\n")
 tn.read_until(b"Password: ")
 tn.write(password.encode('ascii')+b"\n")
 time.sleep(2)     
 tn.write(b"enable\n")  
 time.sleep(2)
 tn.write(b"admin\n")  
 time.sleep(2)
 tn.write(b"config t\n")
 time.sleep(2)
 tn.write(b"snmp-server community Secured ro\n") 
 print ("Switch ",Host,"Configured")
 line=tn.read_some()
 tn.close()                           
 print (line)                      

#closing file 
ipfile.close()

 Todd
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 7:40:48 PM
Re: Linux Worm Exploits and Defenses
Yes, I agree, that is why I had mentioned in my excert that the vendor should disable telnet altogether or block it.

In addition, companies like Cisco and Juniper ask the user to change the default password. If the user does not change the password then the system should be halted until they change it based on recommended security guidelines (listed below).

NIST password guidelines - "NIST guidance recommends the following for passwords: An eight character minimum and 64 character maximum length. The ability to use all special characters but no special requirement to use them."
  • An eight character minimum and 64 character maximum length
  • The ability to use all special characters but no special requirement to use them
  • Restrict sequential and repetitive characters (e.g. 12345 or aaaaaa)
  • Restrict context specific passwords (e.g. the name of the site, etc.)
  • Restrict commonly used passwords (e.g. [email protected], etc.)
  • Restrict passwords obtained from previous breach corpuses
NIST Security Password Guidelines

Todd

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 6:47:51 PM
Defaults
It could attack any Linux system deployed on the Internet with open telnet ports and default admin credentials. So it is not supposed to be an attack at all. Who would leave defaults as they are today?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 6:46:12 PM
Re: Linux Worm Exploits and Defenses
The IoT devices related to the internet. That is why they become vulnerable too.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 6:44:13 PM
Re: Linux Worm Exploits and Defenses
A number of companies are doing this but after reading the report, it seems this practice is not performed across the board. Most SME would not pay enough attention to it so they mostly miss it.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 6:42:14 PM
Re: Linux Worm Exploits and Defenses
I do agree the responsibility should rest with the consumer where the system asks or provides insight on how to change the admin password Anting left to consumers will be at high risk. Better to avoid expecting anything from consumers.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2019 | 6:40:46 PM
For fun
the software is purely destructive; it captures no data and asks for no ransom. Researcher Ankit Anubhav traced the malware back to its origins and found the developer, who uses the online name "Light Leafon." Obviously this was for fun. Distraction is huge.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13096
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
TronLink Wallet 2.2.0 stores user wallet keystore in plaintext and places them in insecure storage. An attacker can read and reuse the user keystore of a valid user via /data/data/com.tronlink.wallet/shared_prefs/<wallet-name>.xml to gain unauthorized access.
CVE-2019-13097
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
The application API of Cat Runner Decorate Home version 2.8.0 for Android does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable. Attackers can manipulate users' score parameters exchanged between client and server.
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
OFFIS.de DCMTK 3.6.3 and below is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Possible code execution and confirmed Denial of Service. The component is: DcmRLEDecoder::decompress() (file dcrledec.h, line 122). The attack vector is: Many scenarios of DICOM file processing (e.g. DICOM to image conver...
CVE-2019-12326
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
Missing file and path validation in the ringtone upload function of the Akuvox R50P VoIP phone 50.0.6.156 allows an attacker to upload a manipulated ringtone file, with an executable payload (shell commands within the file) and trigger code execution.
CVE-2019-13100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
The Send Anywhere application 9.4.18 for Android stores confidential information insecurely on the system (i.e., in cleartext), which allows a non-root user to find out the username/password of a valid user via /data/data/com.estmob.android.sendanywhere/shared_prefs/sendanywhere_device.xml.