Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT/Embedded Security

3/19/2018
09:35 AM
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
50%
50%

IoT Use Complicates Security Landscape in Healthcare

As billions of IoT devices are coming online, especially in healthcare, the security landscape is getting increasingly complicated, according to a report from Zingbox.

Securing the expanding universe of billions of Internet of Things devices is anything but straightforward. But in the healthcare sector, it presents unique threats to human safety and operational efficiency.

To date, there's been a dearth of data from hospitals and clinics about the effects of cybersecurity threats and attacks. Over the course of this year, hackers will escalate activity targeted at medical facility weaknesses, with the implication that patient deaths could result, according to Zingbox, a firm based in Mountain View, Calif., that develops IoT device security for the healthcare sector.

However, new information collected from 50 US facilities and tens of thousands of medical devices over 12 months offers those in healthcare a snapshot of where the vulnerabilities are, and how they could be minimized. This study is part of what Zingbox calls the first cybersecurity report for the sector.

The study has some surprising results.

"This [data] gives us a wide-scale view of connected healthcare devices and enables us to pinpoint not just where the vulnerabilities are, but what's triggering the issues," Xu Zou, CEO and co-founder of Zingbox, told Security Now. "Many organizations don't have a clear picture of their networks, or even what devices are connected [across them]."

Bad practice
It turns out that user behavior is the biggest problem. About 40% of security issues noted in the report were created by medical staff using embedded browsers on workstations to access the Internet, conduct online chat or download content. A further 33% of risks on connected medical devices were accounted for by outdated operating systems or software, obsolete applications or unpatched firmware.

Facilities have clearly fallen down here, when policy enforcement and network restriction could cut the number of rogue applications and risky browser usage that inadvertently place patient lives at risk. Any threat that impairs operational wellbeing -- such as a ransomware or distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack -- also reduces the ability to care for patients effectively.

Devices that threaten safety
Any medical device connected to the network poses a threat. These include infusions pumps, imaging systems, patient monitors, ECG machines, nurse call and patient tracking systems. Interestingly, although infusion pumps are the most widely deployed medical device -- and are directly connected to patients -- they are the least susceptible to security threats.

"[We] point out that while infusion pumps make up nearly 50% of connected devices in hospitals, they don't represent the largest attack surface," said Zou. "Security issues relating to pumps were only at 2%, however, attention to protecting these devices should still be a priority since a successful attack on a single pump could result in disabling the bulk of all infusion pumps through lateral movement and infection."

Imaging systems ranked number one in the report as the source of 51% of all security issues. That's partly a product of the sheer variety of imaging systems in place. These range from X-ray, ultrasound and MRI machines, to digital imaging and communications workstations, and picture archiving and communications servers.

It's also a product of the number network applications that run on imaging systems. These devices average about seven network applications per device, more than any other, and three of the applications are specifically for communicating outside of the organization. Other devices are primarily designed for intra-organizational communication, and so they present a reduced threat.

Also, imaging systems are often built on commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) OS, are expected to have a long lifespan, are expensive to replace and according to the report, often outlive support agreements with vendors.

Device segmentation
Almost nine out of ten hospitals surveyed have less than 20 VLANs to successfully segment and isolate medical devices against lateral movement from an attack. Zingbox views this as too few for almost any size of facility to be of practical cybersecurity benefit. For organizations without the visibility into their connected devices, all they have is a collection of IP addresses without any context.

Organizations looking to VLAN segmentation for protection also need to bear in mind that only about 25% of the devices on healthcare networks are medical. Almost 45% of devices are PCs, with multiple other devices comprising printers, scanners, IP phones, smartphones and surveillance cameras. This is itself is a big weakness since a PC can be attacked and then laterally moved to medical devices.

"Understanding how [attacks] enter our networks is critical to protecting patient data and safety," said Zou. "As we continue to gather more knowledge, we can better arm our staff and networks to prevent these dangerous events."

Related posts:

— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8913
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-12
A local, arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the SplitCompat.install endpoint in Android's Play Core Library versions prior to 1.7.2. A malicious attacker could create an apk which targets a specific application, and if a victim were to install this apk, the attacker could perform a dir...
CVE-2020-7029
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the System Management Interface Web component of Avaya Aura Communication Manager and Avaya Aura Messaging. This vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform Web administration actions with the privileged ...
CVE-2020-17489
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
An issue was discovered in certain configurations of GNOME gnome-shell through 3.36.4. When logging out of an account, the password box from the login dialog reappears with the password still visible. If the user had decided to have the password shown in cleartext at login time, it is then visible f...
CVE-2020-17495
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
django-celery-results through 1.2.1 stores task results in the database. Among the data it stores are the variables passed into the tasks. The variables may contain sensitive cleartext information that does not belong unencrypted in the database.
CVE-2020-0260
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
There is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-152225183