Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT/Embedded Security

End of Bibblio RCM includes -->
3/9/2018
09:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

Increased IoT Use Causing Added Enterprise Security Concerns Report

A new study from Trustwave finds that 60% of enterprises are using IoT devices, but that these connected sensors have caused at least one security issue.

Six out of ten companies are using some type of Internet of Things device within their enterprise network, and these same organizations have had to deal with at least one security incident related to these connected sensors, according to the new IoT Cybersecurity Readiness Report issued by Trustwave.

The report is based on the responses of 137 security and IT pros knowledgeable about or responsible for IoT-related security practices within their organization. The mean number of employees at the enterprises surveyed was just under 17,000 and includes a "wide range of industries," according to Trustwave.

The most frequent problem encountered by organizations was a malware infiltration that entered the network through an IoT device.

(Source: Pixabay)
(Source: Pixabay)

This prevalence is forcing organizations to reconsider their threat models related to IoT.

The report notes that another 20% of non-connected organizations plan to connect within the next 12 months. The researchers found that this means -- by the end of 2018 -- only one in six organizations will not be using at least a minimal level of IoT technology for some business purpose.

However, there is a disparity in security awareness about IoT. Specifically, 28% of respondents consider their IoT security strategy "very important" to the organization, but more than one third of those surveyed believe that IoT security is only "somewhat" or "not" important.

This may arise from questions on just how relevant IoT will be to an organization. Even though 57% of organizations plan to increase their penetration of IoT devices in the future, a minority of 19% report that they will not. However, 23% of respondents are simply unsure of the future status of IoT and can give no answer.

But respondents are increasingly aware that some IoT-related problem will soon affect them. The report notes that "55% believe that it will happen during the next two years, and another 10% believe it will occur at some point beyond two years from now."


The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

One third of those surveyed simply are not sure when an IoT-related security incident will happen. But, tellingly, only 5% of respondents believe that one will never happen.

The decisions makers don't think that they will be able to defend themselves, either. The report finds that 10% were "very" confident that they can detect and protect against IoT-related security incidents, while 62% are only "somewhat" or "not" confident that they can do so.

The effects of a company's partners use of IoT is another security area that is not well policed. The survey found that fewer than one half of organizations consistently assess the IoT security risk posed by third-party partners, while another 34% will do so only "periodically." But, nearly one in five organizations do not perform this risk assessment at all, which may leave them vulnerable to security risks introduced by the use of third parties that employ IoT devices.

While the report highlights the emerging IoT threat vectors, it remains an organization's continuing responsibility to vet IoT vendors before making new purchases. This would include evaluating their history and checking security reports from them.

Enterprises should also have an agile methodology for quickly patching IoT vulnerabilities to prevent attacks leveraging flawed devices. Being able to quickly react to IoT threats will become crucial as they grow larger in the future.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Improving Enterprise Cybersecurity With XDR
Enterprises are looking at eXtended Detection and Response technologies to improve their abilities to detect, and respond to, threats. While endpoint detection and response is not new to enterprise security, organizations have to improve network visibility, expand data collection and expand threat hunting capabilites if they want their XDR deployments to succeed. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: a market overview for XDR from Omdia, questions to ask before deploying XDR, and an XDR primer.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-0624
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-28
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-path prior to 5.0.0.
CVE-2017-20105
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-28
A vulnerability was found in Simplessus 3.7.7. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation of the argument path with the input ..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2fetc%2fpasswd leads to path traversal. The att...
CVE-2017-20106
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-28
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Lithium Forum 2017 Q1. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Compose Message Handler. The manipulation of the argument upload_url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack needs to be approached locally...
CVE-2017-20107
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-28
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in ShadeYouVPN.com Client 2.0.1.11. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to improper privilege management. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used...
CVE-2017-20104
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-28
A vulnerability was found in Simplessus 3.7.7. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Cookie Handler. The manipulation of the argument UWA_SID leads to sql injection (Time). The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to th...