Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Infrastructure Security //

DNS

// // //
4/26/2018
08:05 AM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now

Cryptocurrency Theft Uses Old Exploit to Highjack AWS Traffic

Earlier this week, attackers stole about $150,000 worth of cryptocurrency by exploiting a flaw in Domain Name System servers that allowed the group to hijack AWS traffic for about two hours.

A group of unknown attackers stole about $150,000 in cryptocurrency earlier this week. The theft, which included exploiting well-known but older flaws in Domain Name System servers, hijacked some Amazon Web Services traffic and led victims to a phishing site.

The theft appears to have happened on April 24, according to the MyEtherWallet group on Reddit, which posted a short explanation about the incident.

In short, for about two hours on Tuesday, users of the MyEtherWallet website had their traffic re-routed to another IP address, which appears to have been hosted in Russia, according to several reports including one posted on Oracle's Internet Intelligence site.

If a user landed on the cryptocurrency website during those two hours, his or her keys were stolen, which then gave the attackers access to the cryptocurrency.

"Affected users are likely those who have clicked the 'ignore' button on an SSL warning that pops up when they visited a malicious version of the MEW website," according to the Reddit post.

At a high-level, DNS servers are the phone books of the Internet and they contain a directory of domain names that are then translated into Internet Protocol or IP addresses that bring users to the websites that they want. In this case the attackers took advantage of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) -- a complex system of routers and pathways that makes sure traffic gets to where it's going -- which works with DNS but is known to have flaws.

If an attacker can find the flaws in BGP, then they can hijack the DNS server.

In this case, the MyEtherWallet group is supported and hosted on AWS and uses the provider's Route 53 DNS service.

In a statement to Security Now, AWS noted that it's looking at the incident, but stated that it was another Internet Service Provider at fault:

Neither AWS nor Amazon Route 53 were hacked or compromised. An upstream Internet Service Provider (ISP) was compromised by a malicious actor who then used that provider to announce a subset of Route 53 IP addresses to other networks with whom this ISP was peered. These peered networks, unaware of this issue, accepted these announcements and incorrectly directed a small percentage of traffic for a single customer's domain to the malicious copy of that domain.

In Oracle's report, it appears that the ISP that was breached this week is eNet, a large provider located in Columbus, Ohio. "It appears that eNet/XLHost (AS10297) suffered a breach enabling attackers to impersonate Amazon's authoritative DNS service," according to Oracle.


The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

This is also not the first time that this type of Russia-linked DNS hijacking has occurred. In December, security researchers found that traffic for about 80 different high-volume websites, including Apple, Google and Facebook, were re-routed to Russia IP addresses. (See Russian DNS Gobbling Up Internet Traffic.)

In that case, it's believed that the BGP routers were rewritten by attackers.

The question that this incident has raised is why would someone or some group go to the trouble and expense of attacking a major ISP for what appears to have been a small amount of cryptocurrency?

Kevin Beaumont, a well-known security expert and writer, raises these questions in a post about Tuesday's incident.

"It seems unlikely MyEtherWallet.com was the only target, when they had such levels of access," Beaumont writes. "Additionally, the attackers failed to obtain an SSL certificate while man-in-the-middle attacking the traffic -- a very easy process -- which alerted people to the issue at scale."

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Everything You Need to Know About DNS Attacks
It's important to understand DNS, potential attacks against it, and the tools and techniques required to defend DNS infrastructure. This report answers all the questions you were afraid to ask. Domain Name Service (DNS) is a critical part of any organization's digital infrastructure, but it's also one of the least understood. DNS is designed to be invisible to business professionals, IT stakeholders, and many security professionals, but DNS's threat surface is large and widely targeted. Attackers are causing a great deal of damage with an array of attacks such as denial of service, DNS cache poisoning, DNS hijackin, DNS tunneling, and DNS dangling. They are using DNS infrastructure to take control of inbound and outbound communications and preventing users from accessing the applications they are looking for. To stop attacks on DNS, security teams need to shore up the organization's security hygiene around DNS infrastructure, implement controls such as DNSSEC, and monitor DNS traffic
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-33196
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences. Cross site scripting (XSS) can be triggered by review volumes. This issue has been fixed in version 4.4.7.
CVE-2023-33185
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Django-SES is a drop-in mail backend for Django. The django_ses library implements a mail backend for Django using AWS Simple Email Service. The library exports the `SESEventWebhookView class` intended to receive signed requests from AWS to handle email bounces, subscriptions, etc. These requests ar...
CVE-2023-33187
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Highlight is an open source, full-stack monitoring platform. Highlight may record passwords on customer deployments when a password html input is switched to `type="text"` via a javascript "Show Password" button. This differs from the expected behavior which always obfuscates `ty...
CVE-2023-33194
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences on the web.The platform does not filter input and encode output in Quick Post validation error message, which can deliver an XSS payload. Old CVE fixed the XSS in label HTML but didn’t fix it when clicking save. This issue was...
CVE-2023-2879
PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
GDSDB infinite loop in Wireshark 4.0.0 to 4.0.5 and 3.6.0 to 3.6.13 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file