Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

How To Make The Right Choice About Security Outsourcing

New report offers in-depth look at security services alternatives -- and how to evaluate them

So you're thinking about bringing in a third-party service provider to help out with IT security in your organization. The $64,000 question: Which providers should you consider?

The answer to this question, which was never simple, is becoming more complex, according to "Making the Security Outsourcing Decision," a new Dark Reading/InformationWeek Analytics report published today. In fact, the rapid diversification of the security services market, coupled with the lightning-fast growth in malware and other threats, is making it tougher than ever to find the right service provider for any one business situation.

"Variety is the spice of life, and that's particularly true with outsourced security options," the report says. "Different outsourcing service providers offer many different 'packages' of security technologies, although the lines are blurring and most players offer a lengthy laundry list of services."

The problem, experts say, is that while the market for outsourced security services is growing, the players are changing and consolidating. At the same time a number of major software vendors have entered the market with software-as-a-service (SaaS) and professional consulting offerings, some of the smaller providers have been bought out and/or reorganized. As a result of these rapid shifts, making apples-to-apples comparisons between service offerings has become nearly impossible, experts say.

Today's security services may offer any number of capabilities, the report notes. "Technologies broadly supported include threat protection (antivirus, antispam, antipharming/antiphishing), Web filtering, vulnerability scanning, authentication, unified threat management, email archiving, encryption, firewall, VPN, intrusion detection and prevention (IDP), network monitoring and log review, penetration testing/compliance review, backup and storage, and business continuity," it states.

So which service offerings and providers should your organization be considering -- if it should consider any at all? "Companies find the right service provider through a variety of methods, including word-of-mouth in the field, industry analyst reports, online reviews, testimonials, channel partners, and by tapping their current technology vendor for managed services," the report states.

"Experts say it is important that potential providers offer a selection of standardized or prepackaged offerings, because customized services may not be scalable. Enterprises should also look for providers with recognizable names that are stable and more likely to be around for the long haul."

Smaller companies continue to be the most likely to choose third-party security services, with 41 percent citing a lack of in-house technical skills necessary to properly support security needs, and 17 percent citing the need to reallocate staff to projects with greater visibility to senior management, the report states. But large companies are increasingly evaluating third-party services for specific security functions, such as email security, content filtering, and Web security functions, experts observe.

The increasing frequency of security breaches is also a driving factor behind outsourcing, according to industry research. A report published last year by Verizon Business indicates that 75 percent of the data breaches it studied were discovered by a third party, rather than a user or IT staffer inside the organization.

Click here to download the full security outsourcing report.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2021
How to Better Secure Your Microsoft 365 Environment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/25/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: We need more votes, check the obituaries.
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3317
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
KLog Server through 2.4.1 allows authenticated command injection. async.php calls shell_exec() on the original value of the source parameter.
CVE-2013-2512
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
The ftpd gem 0.2.1 for Ruby allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacters in a LIST or NLST command argument within FTP protocol traffic.
CVE-2021-3165
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
SmartAgent 3.1.0 allows a ViewOnly attacker to create a SuperUser account via the /#/CampaignManager/users URI.
CVE-2021-1070
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier Series, Jetson Xavier NX, TX1, TX2, Nano and Nano 2GB, L4T versions prior to 32.5, contains a vulnerability in the apply_binaries.sh script used to install NVIDIA components into the root file system image, in which improper access control is applied, which may lead to an un...
CVE-2021-1071
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
NVIDIA Tegra kernel in Jetson AGX Xavier Series, Jetson Xavier NX, TX1, TX2, Nano and Nano 2GB, all L4T versions prior to r32.5, contains a vulnerability in the INA3221 driver in which improper access control may lead to unauthorized users gaining access to system power usage data, which may lead to...