Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

Guest Blog // Selected Security Content Provided By Sophos
What's This?
4/9/2009
08:28 AM
Graham Cluley
Graham Cluley
Security Insights
50%
50%

Hackers Launch Fake Conficker Antivirus Attacks

With all the focus on the Conficker worm in recent weeks, it should come as no surprise at all to find that cybercriminals are taking advantage of the headline-grabbing worm for their own ends.

With all the focus on the Conficker worm in recent weeks, it should come as no surprise at all to find that cybercriminals are taking advantage of the headline-grabbing worm for their own ends.Evidence of this can be seen in a malicious spam campaign, intercepted by experts at SophosLabs, which poses as a security warning from Microsoft's security department.

The email messages tell the unsuspecting user that "Microsoft has been alerted by your Internet company that your system is showing signs of infection," and advising that a security check is run on the computer:

Of course, clicking on the link contained inside the email is a very bad idea, especially for anyone who can't resist acting on the following message:

Yes, you've guessed it. This is another example of a fake antivirus or scareware attack, designed to frighten users into parting with their hard-earned cash by displaying bogus security warnings. The free scan will claim to find malware on your computer, and then scare you into purchasing a "remedy" from the hackers.

The irony is that the more we teach computer users about the importance of information security and raise their awareness of Internet threats, the greater the temptation for the hackers to take advantage of their heightened awareness by scaring people into spending money unnecessarily.

And if the hackers are prepared to use dishonorable means to display their bogus warnings in the first place, then how can you feel confident they won't do something illegal with your credit card if you do buy their "clean-up" software?

Graham Cluley is senior technology consultant at Sophos, and has been working in the computer security field since the early 1990s. When he's not updating his other blog on the Sophos website you can find him on Twitter at @gcluley. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-3349
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
lightdm before 0.9.6 writes in .dmrc and Xauthority files using root permissions while the files are in user controlled folders. A local user can overwrite root-owned files via a symlink, which can allow possible privilege escalation.
CVE-2019-10080
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
The XMLFileLookupService in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2 allowed trusted users to inadvertently configure a potentially malicious XML file. The XML file has the ability to make external calls to services (via XXE) and reveal information such as the versions of Java, Jersey, and Apache that the NiFI ...
CVE-2019-10083
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
When updating a Process Group via the API in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2, the response to the request includes all of its contents (at the top most level, not recursively). The response included details about processors and controller services which the user may not have had read access to.
CVE-2019-12421
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
When using an authentication mechanism other than PKI, when the user clicks Log Out in NiFi versions 1.0.0 to 1.9.2, NiFi invalidates the authentication token on the client side but not on the server side. This permits the user's client-side token to be used for up to 12 hours after logging out to m...
CVE-2019-19126
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
On the x86-64 architecture, the GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.31 fails to ignore the LD_PREFER_MAP_32BIT_EXEC environment variable during program execution after a security transition, allowing local attackers to restrict the possible mapping addresses for loaded libraries and thus bypass ASLR ...