Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/31/2017
03:30 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Hackers Cybersquat on Hundreds of Luxury Fashion Brand Domains

DomainTools identifies over 500 websites tricking web users into thinking they're clicking on to luxury fashion websites.

Seattle – DomainTools, a domain name and DNS-based cyber threat intelligence company, today released research looking at how cybersquatters are currently targeting global luxury fashion brands. DomainTools found 538 registered domains using the trademarked names of eight of the world’s leading fashion brands.

Cybersquatting is the practice of purchasing domains with the intent of stealing internet traffic from a well-known brand or individual. These domains are often used in phishing email campaigns and various other kinds of scams including pay-per-click ads, for-profit survey sites and social media scams to trick customers into handing over personal details and money for a product.

Following on from its research conducted with Farsight Security on “Luxury Brands, Cheap Domains: Why Retailers Are Losing the Fight Against Online Counterfeiting” the DomainTools research team analyzed domains mimicking Cartier, Givenchy, Louis Vuitton, Burberry, Hermes, Chanel, Prada and Gucci using its PhishEye tool. PhishEye allows users to search for existing and new domains that spoof legitimate brand, product, organization, or other names. In total, there were 538 domains identified as high risk that contained the brand names. Some examples include:

  • giivenchy.com
  • louisvuiitton.us
  • burberryyuk.com
  • chamel.us
  • louisvitton.com
  • cartierwatches.me
  • hermes-bag.us
  • ptada.com
  • gwcci.com

“The ease of creating a domain is great for the average person looking to start their own website but it is a never-ending nuisance for brands that have to monitor for domain squatters. The bigger and more lucrative your brand, the more of a target you become for cyber criminals,” said Tim Helming, Director, Product Management at DomainTools. “Many companies tackle this by proactively buying domain names that are similar to their own name with help from tools like our PhishEye product. It’s a relatively cheap insurance policy to keep pesky cybersquatters from benefiting by appropriating your brand and helps to keep consumers safe, too.”

DomainTools offers top tips for consumers to avoid falling afoul of a spoofed website:

  • Watch out for domains that have COM-[text] in them, ex. www.starbucks.com-latte.us. We're so accustomed to seeing .com that we can easily overlook the extra text that's appended to it with a dash.
  • Look for typos on the website, coupon, or link that is directing you – for example, check for extra added letters in the domain, such as Yahooo[.]com.
  • Look out for ‘rn’ disguised as an ‘m’, such as modem.com versus modern.com.
  • Verify that the link is what it purports to be by hovering over the link and examining the pop-up text.
  • Realise that if something seems too good to be true, it likely is.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
MITRE Releases 2019 List of Top 25 Software Weaknesses
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/17/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-9717
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
In Libav 12.3, a denial of service in the subtitle decoder allows attackers to hog the CPU via a crafted video file in Matroska format, because srt_to_ass in libavcodec/srtdec.c has a complex format argument to sscanf.
CVE-2019-9719
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
A stack-based buffer overflow in the subtitle decoder in Libav 12.3 allows attackers to corrupt the stack via a crafted video file in Matroska format, because srt_to_ass in libavcodec/srtdec.c misuses snprintf.
CVE-2019-9720
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
A stack-based buffer overflow in the subtitle decoder in Libav 12.3 allows attackers to corrupt the stack via a crafted video file in Matroska format, because srt_to_ass in libavcodec/srtdec.c misuses snprintf.
CVE-2019-16525
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
An XSS issue was discovered in the checklist plugin before 1.1.9 for WordPress. The fill parameter is not correctly filtered in the checklist-icon.php file, and it is possible to inject JavaScript code.
CVE-2019-9619
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.