Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

5/17/2010
03:57 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Five Ways To (Physically) Hack A Data Center

Many data centers contain easy-to-exploit physical vulnerabilities that don't require hacking into the network

You can spend millions of dollars on network security, but it's all for naught if the data center has physical weaknesses that leave it open to intruders. Red team experts hired to social-engineer their way into an organization say they regularly find physical hacking far too easy.

Ryan Jones, senior security consultant with Trustwave's SpiderLabs, says data centers he has investigated for security weaknesses commonly have the same cracks in the physical infrastructure that can be exploited for infiltrating these sensitive areas. Jones says the five simplest ways to hack into a data center are by crawling through void spaces in the data center walls, lock-picking the door, "tailgating" into the building, posing as contractors or service repairman, and jimmying open improperly installed doors or windows.

"Over the years, you can spend millions of dollars protecting your network, but [many organizations] are leaving the front door wide open. They are missing huge gaping holes" in their physical security of the data center, says Jones, who will discuss his findings at the conference today in Sao Paulo, Brazil. "These are the top ways we get in."

One of the flaws in the physical design of most data centers is their drop ceilings and raised floors, Jones says. "The walls don't go all the way up [to the ceiling] or down [to the floor]," he says. The drop ceiling leaves a void for an intruder to remove a ceiling tile from a nearby area and then crawl to the data center from above it. "You can crawl down carefully to where you need to drop down," Jones says.

And raised floors -- built for cabling and cooling purposes -- can also be physically exploited, he says. "With a raised floor, there's a gap between the installed floor and the concrete bottom of the building," he says.

Jones says crawling in via ceiling tiles or through raised floor gaps are easy ways to get inside without getting noticed or doing any damage to the structure. "I've seen employees take advantages of these weaknesses" for things like going back to get keys they left in the office, he says.

The best fix is to fill those gaps with sheet rock, he says. Some organizations opt to lay metal fencing or chicken wire there as well, but Jones acknowledges that a determined intruder could merely cut the wire and gain entry into the data center.

Social engineering expert and penetration tester Steve Stasiukonis, founder and vice president of Secure Network Inc., says these gaps are "brilliant" ways to get inside the data center. If there's sheetrock in the way, he says, it's easy to cut a hole in it and squeeze inside. "A lot of government facilities have a 'code of silence room' [where] they have to make sure the sheetrock goes to the roof and there's a barrier so no one can climb over the ceiling tiles," says Stasiukonis, who doesn't perform any carpentry-type breaches on behalf of his clients because it's too destructive to the data center environment.

Another common physical weakness in the data center is the door lock: Jones says he sees many weak locks and unprotected door latches at the data center threshold. "Lock-picking is a well-known and understood trick," he says. "It's almost a sport now."

Free lock-picking kits distributed at Defcon and for sale on the cheap online make it easy for most anyone to crack the standard door lock, he says.

Secure Network's Stasiukonis says his team has its own lock-picking kits, including a "gun" the size of an electric toothbrush that picks locks. "Most data centers have cheap, regular key locks on their doors," he says. He says his team sometimes installs small wireless cameras you can purchase from a spy shop that snoops on keyed-entry doors to learn the code when someone enters the data center.

The best way to lock down a data center lock is to either purchase a higher-end lock or an electronic lock, or to use biometrics, Jones says.

Proximity access keys are best, according to Stasiukonis, because they also authenticate the user who enters the data center and provides an audit trail of the person's comings and goings. "This technology is rock-solid and relatively inexpensive," he says.

Jones and Stasiukonis both swear by "tailgating" as a foolproof way to get into the building -- or even the data center -- via legitimate employees. Stasiukonis recalls one engagement for a client in which he posed as a hardware salesman and got into a data center secured with biometrics by helping carry a tray of food into the data center. "People are usually very gracious. They even hold the door for you," Stasiukonis says.

SpiderLabs' Jones says it's a sure way in because most people don't want to challenge someone's legitimacy at the door or get into any confrontations. "Every building has a smoking area around it. You can hang out there and wait ... and follow [an employee] in," he says. "And if you're on crutches or talking on the phone, people hold the door open for you. They don't want to be rude."

The only ways to mitigate this type of unauthorized entry is to have either turnstile-based badge entry, where only one person can get in at a time and with a badge, or with some sort of rotating door, he says. "Or a security guard who makes sure people have badges and doesn't let in [those who don't]," he says.

It also helps to train employees about letting others into the building. "You have to make them aware that it's not just their responsibility, but it's important to their jobs. If the company loses a lot of money [due to an intrusion], they might not have a job anymore," Jones says.

Then there's the classic social engineering ploy of posing as a technician, salesperson, cleaning crew, or contractor as a way to gain entry into the building without raising suspicion or being questioned. Both Jones and Stasiukonis have donned costumes as courier servicemen or equipment repairmen in their engagements for clients. "When all else fails, social engineering is the way to go. It works almost every time," Jones says.

Stasiukonis' firm now even hires out trucks and hardware to go with their get-ups. "We've kicked it up a notch. We have the truck with a load gate, and we have a copier we bring in 'on trial,'" he says. "What's more authentic than the guy who brings stuff?"

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
SamMaron
100%
0%
SamMaron,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/13/2015 | 5:26:03 AM
Data Center
Another common physical weakness in the data center is the door lock. The only ways to mitigate this type of unauthorized entry is to have either turnstile-based badge entry, where only one person can get in at a time and with a badge.

ideals solutions group
JohnD703
50%
50%
JohnD703,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/18/2016 | 9:24:18 AM
Re: Data Center
You have EXCATLY described the methods of protection in Google Data Centers. Check the video in YouTube!!!!
JohnD703
50%
50%
JohnD703,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/18/2016 | 9:24:26 AM
Re: Data Center
You have EXCATLY described the methods of protection in Google Data Centers. Check the video in YouTube!!!!
stact123
50%
50%
stact123,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/2/2019 | 1:45:12 AM
Re: Data Center
I propose merely very good along with reputable data, consequently visualize it: m&a virtual data room
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...
CVE-2020-5217
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could b...
CVE-2020-5223
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In PrivateBin versions 1.2.0 before 1.2.2, and 1.3.0 before 1.3.2, a persistent XSS attack is possible. Under certain conditions, a user provided attachment file name can inject HTML leading to a persistent Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The vulnerability has been fixed in PrivateBin v1.3...
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.