Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

12/11/2014
05:10 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

FBI Calls For Law Facilitating Security Information Sharing

Uniform breach notification laws and amendments to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act are also on the list.

FBI officials are calling for updates to the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and for new legislation that encourages threat data information sharing and establishes a uniform federal standard for data breach notification.

In a statement before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs yesterday, Joseph M. Demarest, assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division, described some of the bureau's recent successes and stressed the importance of information sharing. "And I cannot make the following statement frequently enough," he said. "The private sector is an essential partner if we are to succeed in defeating the cyber threat our nation confronts."

The federal government has been banging that drum for several years, urging the private sector to pass on threat intelligence voluntarily, and promising to reciprocate. The government has established several units to facilitate such communication: the Guardian Victim Analysis Unit, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), the Domestic Security Alliance Council, the National Cyber-Forensics and Training Alliance, the National Industry Partnership Unit, and the FBI Liaison Alert System (FLASH), which disseminated 34 critical threat alerts between April 2013 and July 2014.

There was, understandably, some resistance from organizations that weren't eager to spread around details of security failures. Now, however, Demarest reports that the IC3 alone receives approximately 800 complaints per day.

    The FBI would support legislation that would establish a clear framework for sharing and reduce risk in the process, in addition to providing strong and straightforward safeguards for the privacy and civil liberties of Americans. US citizens must have confidence that threat information is being shared appropriately, and we in the law enforcement and intelligence communities must be as transparent as possible.

Demarest also described examples of how information sharing and collaboration efforts between American and foreign law enforcement entities -- including placing FBI cyberspecialists in "key international locations" -- have paid dividends. He cited the GameOver Zeus disruption in May and the November Silk Road 2.0 disruption that resulted in the seizure of more than 400 .onion addresses on the Tor network, along with the arrest of Blake Benthall, a.k.a. "Defcon," a Silk Road owner-operator.

    A decade ago, for example, if an FBI agent tracked an Internet Protocol address to a criminal investigation, and if that IP address was located in a foreign country, this meant the effective end of the investigation. Since that time, however, the FBI has placed cyberspecialists in key international locations to facilitate the investigation of cybercrimes affecting the US.

Colby DeRodeff, chief strategy officer of ThreatStream, provides another reason for openness and collaboration. "The major challenge is the adversary has no obstacles when it comes to sharing and collaboration," he says. "Malware and attack methods, as well as credentials are available to even the most unsophisticated criminals with no legal teams or governing bodies restricting what can be done.

"With that said, obviously, as security has the upmost sensitivity, organizations want to collaborate but need secure methods in which to do so."

Demarest also pushed for amendments to the CFAA, which has not been updated since 2008. "The intervening years have again created the need for the enactment of modest incremental changes."

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
smalpree
50%
50%
smalpree,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/15/2014 | 10:19:39 AM
Not soon enough, but a step in the right direction
I spent about a year fdoing research on thist opic and how business implements and depends on Defense in Depth and published a peer reviewed white paper via the SANS institute which can be found here in the SANS Reading room.

In this paper I discuss how we specifi9cally must start sharing sanitized attack data with law enforcement and each other if we are to even have a chance of slowing down the attackers much less stopping them

My paper can be found here: https://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/warfare/defense-depth-impractical-strategy-cyber-world-33896

I am glad to see that there is a trend now to do what I have been advocating for with the FBI and others since 2011.

I refer to the threatscape we face as Sustained Cyber-Siege Defense:

Excerpt from my publication: (Ignore the numbering - the web page won't let me change it.)

Keystones of Sustained Cyber-Siege Defense:

  1. Abundant participation - The greater the number of participants then the more effective participants will be in their strategies for Prevent, Detect, Contain and Eradicate. As a result, the metrics should show a reduction in detection times and reduce the amount of time it takes to push attackers out.
  2. Rapid and sanitized information sharing. 
    1. Vertical Markets must share the data

i.      Strip out company specifics, but share the data.  In order for there to be success it is critical for IT Security Professionals to not only have accurate, actionable data, they must get it in a timely fashion as well.

    1. Vendor sharing of sanitized data, even amongst competitors, is also essential to success.  Vendors have to cooperate and share sanitized and standardized data to detect and eradicate the attackers.  Vendors must develop a standard to share data in a format that is able to be correlated.

i.      All Malware should be identified by hash values and not the dozens of text based aliases seen today.

  1. Vendor Relations – many competitors often use the same vendors.
    1. Use market pressures on vendors, even those that compete with one another to deliver required services in a collaborative manner. 
    2. Place the demand on vendors to work together, with the business and vertical market peers to deliver a higher quality of combined services.
  2. Vendor Specialization – Place pressures on vendors to have services and sales engineers that come from vertical markets that get trained up on the business and processes.  The better the vendor understands the business and processes then the more valuable that vendor will be in the long term.
  3. Knowledge sharing between vendors and the business. Consideration of an employee exchange program would be a highly effective method for knowledge transfer and sharing.
  4. Corporate Citizenship – Corporations need to learn to work with local and federal authorities.  The lack of information reaching the state and federal level is inhibiting the government's ability to accurately measure and weigh the risks from criminal and state sponsored attackers.  IT Security Professionals must openly cooperate with and share information with the authorities so that their representatives have the information they need to apply pressures through law enforcement and political avenues to help reduce the threats.  In order to do so the authorities will require accurate information that paints a clear picture of what is happening nationwide to create opportunity, budgets and develop appropriate resources and responses.

 

 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
12/13/2014 | 5:04:37 AM
CFAA
It'll be interesting to see what kind of change they're looking for here specifically.  One of the biggest complaints about the CFAA is that it is not infrequently used to punish white-hat hackers/security researchers when instead those hackers and researchers should be recruited for collaboration to help secure vital cyber infrastructure.
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Lessons from the NSA: Know Your Assets
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  12/12/2019
4 Tips to Run Fast in the Face of Digital Transformation
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  12/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...