Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

Enterprises Still Struggling To Get Results From SIEM, Log Management

Most survey respondents still haven't achieved quantifiable benefits, study says

Can you tell if your security information and event management (SIEM) or log management tools are really saving your company money or making it more secure? If you can't, you're not alone.

According to a study published today by Aberdeen Grouponly about 20 percent of SIEM users can point to definite gains from using the tools, as measured by reductions in security incidents, audit deficiencies, or operational costs.

"The majority of respondents have not yet achieved those quantifiable benefits, and in some cases are seeing increases in audit deficiencies, security incidents. and operational costs associated with security management," said Aberdeen in a press release.

Experts at both Aberdeen and Vigilant, a managed security services provider that sponsored the study, say that the problem is not in the SIEM or log management tools themselves, but in the way they are being implemented.

"In many cases, enterprises are too focused on what the vendors tell them the products can do, and not enough on what their real requirements are," says Alison Andrews, CEO of Vigilant, which offers consulting services and a framework for focusing the tools on specific tasks, such as regulatory compliance or reducing security incidents.

The Aberdeen data may also indicate that some of the early SIEM tools were implemented as point solutions to solve specific problems, and that their full functionality hasn't been exploited yet, Andrews says.

"There wasn't as big a gap between the top implementors and the laggards as we'd have expected, in terms of what they've gotten from the technology," she says. "Even though SIEM technology has been around for years, and a lot of enterprises have had it in place for some time, it's still a nascent market."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16395
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
GnuCOBOL 2.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in the cb_name() function in cobc/tree.c via crafted COBOL source code.
CVE-2019-16396
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
GnuCOBOL 2.2 has a use-after-free in the end_scope_of_program_name() function in cobc/parser.y via crafted COBOL source code.
CVE-2019-16199
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
eQ-3 Homematic CCU2 before 2.47.18 and CCU3 before 3.47.18 allow Remote Code Execution by unauthenticated attackers with access to the web interface via an HTTP POST request to certain URLs related to the ReGa core process.
CVE-2019-16391
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 allows authenticated visitors to modify any published content and execute other modifications in the database. This is related to ecrire/inc/meta.php and ecrire/inc/securiser_action.php.
CVE-2019-16392
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 allows prive/formulaires/login.php XSS via error messages.