Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

ENISA Offers Security Recommendations For Cloud Services

New report outlines benefits and risks, offers guidelines for choosing providers

Are cloud services safe to use? What are their security weaknesses? What do enterprises need to know before they sign up?

The European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) today is publishing a 124-page report designed to answer these questions for enterprises all around the globe. Nearly a year in the making, it covers the technical, policy, and legal implications of cloud services, and makes recommendations for how to address the risks and maximize the benefits.

The report identifies 35 specific risks associated with cloud services, as well as some potential security benefits.

Loss of governance is one chief category of risks, ENISA says. "In using cloud infrastructures, the client necessarily cedes control to the Cloud Provider (CP) on a number of issues which may affect security. At the same time, [service level agreements] may not offer a commitment to provide such services on the part of the cloud provider, thus leaving a gap in security defences."

Enterprises also run the risk of being "locked in" to a single provider, the report says. "There is currently little...that could guarantee data, application and service portability," ENISA observes. "This can make it difficult for the customer to migrate from one provider to another or migrate data and services back to an in-house IT environment. This introduces a dependency on a particular CP for service provision."

In addition, enterprises also risk losing separation from other enterprises in a multi-tenant service, ENISA says. "Multi-tenancy and shared resources are defining characteristics of cloud computing. This risk category covers the failure of mechanisms separating storage, memory, routing, and even reputation between different tenants (e.g., so-called guest-hopping attacks)." These risks are still smaller than the risks posed by attacks on traditional operating systems, the report says.

Cloud services may also jeopardize an enterprise's compliance with some regulatory environments, the report notes. In some cases, it may be difficult to audit and certify a specific enterprise's security in a cloud environment, where many enterprises share a common infrastructure.

Some cloud services may not be able to fully delete data after carrying it, the report says. "When a request to delete a cloud resource is made, as with most operating systems, this may not result in true wiping of the data," ENISA says. "Adequate or timely data deletion may also be impossible, either because extra copies of data are stored but are not available, or because the disk to be destroyed also stores data from other clients."

Cloud services could expose enterprises to new forms of insider threat, ENISA says. "Cloud architectures necessitate certain roles which are extremely high-risk," the report says. "Examples include CP system administrators and managed security service providers." The customer management interfaces to a service provider may also be vulnerable to attack, ENISA warns.

In all, the report identifies 35 specific risks associated with cloud services, including organizational, technical, and legal risks. But the report also suggests that there may be benefits to cloud services, even on the security level.

"The scale and flexibility of cloud computing gives the providers a security edge," ENISA says. "For example, providers can instantly call on extra defensive resources like filtering and re-routing. They can also roll out new security patches more efficiently and keep more comprehensive evidence for diagnostics."

The full 124-page report is available for free via the the ENISA Website.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Browsers to Enforce Shorter Certificate Life Spans: What Businesses Should Know
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17366
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate...
CVE-2020-9036
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Jeedom through 4.0.38 allows XSS.
CVE-2020-15127
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Contour ( Ingress controller for Kubernetes) before version 1.7.0, a bad actor can shut down all instances of Envoy, essentially killing the entire ingress data plane. GET requests to /shutdown on port 8090 of the Envoy pod initiate Envoy's shutdown procedure. The shutdown procedure includes flip...
CVE-2020-15132
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Sulu before versions 1.6.35, 2.0.10, and 2.1.1, when the "Forget password" feature on the login screen is used, Sulu asks the user for a username or email address. If the given string is not found, a response with a `400` error code is returned, along with a error message saying that th...
CVE-2020-7298
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Unexpected behavior violation in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to turn off real time scanning via a specially crafted object making a specific function call.