Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

6/19/2015
04:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

US Hosts The Most Botnet Servers

More malicious command and control servers are based in the US than anywhere else, and China is home to the most bots.

The United States leads the world in hosting malicious servers that are used to remotely command and control infected user machines and systems. And the US is the second-most frequent target of those systems, a new report from Level 3 Communications shows.

Level 3 monitored communications between some 1,000 command-and-control servers (C2) and their victims earlier this year to get a better sense of botnet behavior and to examine the potential causes for an increase in the use of botnets in denial of service attacks, data theft, and other malicious activities.

It found that 60% of C2 servers are being used for malicious communications targeting corporate networks. Left unchecked, such C2s have the potential to disrupt businesses and destroy their data assets, Level 3 said.

Level 3 observed botnets being used for malware distribution and phishing services a well as the usual distributed denial-of-service mission. On average, each botnet had 1,700 infected hosts and stayed up for about 38 days before being taken down voluntarily by the criminals themselves or by the service provider. The number of victims per C2 server meanwhile has gone down substantially from a peak of 3,763 in January to 338 in March. Much of that has to do with the increased vigilance displayed by the security industry against the botnet threat, Level 3 said.

From an infrastructure use standpoint, threat actors seem to be taking a page from their enterprise counterparts in using cloud technologies to host their malware tools. Many have begun spinning up virtual machines via legitimate infrastructure-as-a-service providers to host and distribute their malware tools. The relatively limited validation that cloud providers do when provisioning service to new accounts has made it easy for threat actors to subscribe to cloud services, according to Level 3.

The biggest proportion of C2 traffic and most of the victims were from within the United States. But that’s only because the US has a network infrastructure that is highly suitable for botnet operators.

"Geographies with robust communications infrastructures are fertile soil for C2s," says Chris Richter, senior vice president of Managed Security Services for Level 3. "These locations also happen to be in close global proximity to rich industrial and public sector targets for cybercriminals and rogue nation-state actors," he says.

China, meanwhile, which has been accused by US authorities of being behind numerous attacks against American companies and government organizations, is also one of the biggest botnet victims. During the first quarter of 2015, Level 3 counted 532,000 unique IP addresses in China that were being controlled by C2 systems, compared to about 528,000 systems in the US. Other countries with a relatively high number of victims were Norway, Spain, and Ukraine.

"Tracking the threat purpose of a C2 is key because this data can serve as a predictor of risk," the Level 3 report said. "It is important to be able to determine if your servers are communicating with botnets that are operationalized to function in specific purposes, so that you can react to stop the threat."

In many cases, mitigating a threat might involve something as simply as blocking email from infected endpoints to prevent phishing.

"Level 3 published this report to raise awareness of what organizations should expect from their network service providers," Richter says. The report highlights the need for greater levels of partnership and collaboration across the security community for dealing with the botnet threat, he says.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Truths About BEC Scams
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist, CyRC, at Synopsys,  6/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1874
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection mechanisms on the web-ba...
CVE-2019-1875
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Service Catalog could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by t...
CVE-2019-1876
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the HTTPS proxy feature of Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to use the Central Manager as an HTTPS proxy. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication of proxy connection requests. An attacker could exp...
CVE-2019-1878
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) implementation for the Cisco TelePresence Codec (TC) and Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands that are executed by the device. The vulnerability is due to insuff...
CVE-2019-1879
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-20
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to inject arbitrary commands that are executed with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input at the CLI. An attacker could exploi...