Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

2/10/2016
05:25 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

The Phishie Awards: (Dis)Honoring The Best Of The Worst Phishing Attacks

From the costly to the clever to the just plain creepy, here are the recent phishing campaigns that have earned our reluctant recognition.
9 of 11

Most Expensive
Business Email Compromise

In 2015, some phishermen struck gold. And platinum, rubies, and diamonds. 

The FBI dubbed the category of attacks 'business email compromise' in an August advisory. At that time, the Bureau estimated that, since 2013, the total dollar losses to American companies exceeded $740 million, while only hitting around 7,000 targets. When international victims are added in, the losses total $1.2 billion.

For those of you doing the math at home, that means that each individual target was getting hit hard. Ubiquiti Networks was taken for $46.7 million, Crelan Bank in Belgium was slammed for $75.8 million, and a Boeing supplier, aircraft component manufacturer FACC A.G., was hit for $54.5 million. 

So how is it done?

As Don Jackson, threat researcher and malware analyst for PhishLabs explains, BEC attackers conduct reconnaissance on social networks looking for the people on staff who are responsible for issuing payments -- not just those measly payroll checks, but the big sums paid when acquiring new businesses, for example. 

The attackers then spoof executives, sometimes obtaining their email credentials first, and send messages to the individuals who handle large payments and get them to initiate enormous wire transfers to an attacker-controlled account. 

Jackson says the BEC campaigns went in two waves. The first generation of BEC targeted large organizations that take lots of payments every day and went after major payoffs in one big hit. 

From the FBI advisory:

The accountant for a U.S. company recently received an e-mail from her chief executive, who was on vacation out of the country, requesting a transfer of funds on a time-sensitive acquisition that required completion by the end of the day. The CEO said a lawyer would contact the accountant to provide further details.

'It was not unusual for me to receive e-mails requesting a transfer of funds,' the accountant later wrote, and when she was contacted by the lawyer via e-mail, she noted the appropriate letter of authorization-including her CEO's signature over the company's seal-and followed the instructions to wire more than $737,000 to a bank in China.

According to Jackson, the bank accounts to which money is transferred have generally been in the Far East. Sometimes the attackers compromise other people's accounts, other times they open their own. The scammers use money mules to remove the cash -- which is itself an expense and a risk, which is why attackers investing in that kind of criminal infrastructure are willing to go for the bigger payoff. 

Sometimes law enforcement can recover the victim's money, but other times, the accounts have been cleaned out and it's irretrievable, he says.  

Although these mega-sized payout BEC attacks are still happening in Australia and New Zealand, Jackson says BEC attackers have shifted to a subtler version of their attacks...

Most Expensive

Business Email Compromise

In 2015, some phishermen struck gold. And platinum, rubies, and diamonds.

The FBI dubbed the category of attacks "business email compromise" in an August advisory. At that time, the Bureau estimated that, since 2013, the total dollar losses to American companies exceeded $740 million, while only hitting around 7,000 targets. When international victims are added in, the losses total $1.2 billion.

For those of you doing the math at home, that means that each individual target was getting hit hard. Ubiquiti Networks was taken for $46.7 million, Crelan Bank in Belgium was slammed for $75.8 million, and a Boeing supplier, aircraft component manufacturer FACC A.G., was hit for $54.5 million.

So how is it done?

As Don Jackson, threat researcher and malware analyst for PhishLabs explains, BEC attackers conduct reconnaissance on social networks looking for the people on staff who are responsible for issuing payments -- not just those measly payroll checks, but the big sums paid when acquiring new businesses, for example.

The attackers then spoof executives, sometimes obtaining their email credentials first, and send messages to the individuals who handle large payments and get them to initiate enormous wire transfers to an attacker-controlled account.

Jackson says the BEC campaigns went in two waves. The first generation of BEC targeted large organizations that take lots of payments every day and went after major payoffs in one big hit.

From the FBI advisory:

The accountant for a U.S. company recently received an e-mail from her chief executive, who was on vacation out of the country, requesting a transfer of funds on a time-sensitive acquisition that required completion by the end of the day. The CEO said a lawyer would contact the accountant to provide further details.

It was not unusual for me to receive e-mails requesting a transfer of funds, the accountant later wrote, and when she was contacted by the lawyer via e-mail, she noted the appropriate letter of authorizationincluding her CEOs signature over the companys sealand followed the instructions to wire more than $737,000 to a bank in China.

According to Jackson, the bank accounts to which money is transferred have generally been in the Far East. Sometimes the attackers compromise other people's accounts, other times they open their own. The scammers use money mules to remove the cash -- which is itself an expense and a risk, which is why attackers investing in that kind of criminal infrastructure are willing to go for the bigger payoff.

Sometimes law enforcement can recover the victim's money, but other times, the accounts have been cleaned out and it's irretrievable, he says.

Although these mega-sized payout BEC attacks are still happening in Australia and New Zealand, Jackson says BEC attackers have shifted to a subtler version of their attacks...

9 of 11
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sixscrews
50%
50%
sixscrews,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/17/2016 | 6:58:17 PM
Re: Greatest source of risk
Unfortunately, that has been true for more years that I can count (40+).

From fake 'demo' disks for 5 1/4" drives to downloads off websites, it's the employee that is the primary entry point for attacks.

How do you educate your employees?  How do you justify this kind of training to management?  Well, good luck.

Most managers are unaware of the vlunerability of thier groups/division/organization's staff to these attacks.  And you will be marked down as a Chicken Little if you push the problem in an open forum.

The best way is to include training and warnings for new hires - it's an 'inoculation' process.  

This leaves the 'old guard' to educate - and they are often the most vlunerable.  The person who deals with appointments for salespeople, the person who answers the phone (and, by the way, gets all the undeliverable emails....).

Filtering/deleting all the undeliverable emails is a good first line of defense - or you can divert these messages to someone who has more familarity with attacks.  But this drains your resources - better to just trash the undeliverables.

But many institutions have staff who have been there since before cell phones were invented - how do you deal with them?  I have tried many times and found the 'gaming' strategy works best - build up a collecton of attacks and make it into a game - tell them it's something to play with.  When they fall for an attack don't scold, explain.  Remember the old country doctor whose 'bedside manner' could settle most problems?  Take that approach - you are often the new person on the staff teaching the person with the longest tenure - be humble and explain, explain, explain.  If they don't understand it's not their fault - it's yours.  Try another approach - you CAN make it work.

And - best of luck.

wb
sixscrews
50%
50%
sixscrews,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/17/2016 | 6:40:45 PM
Re: Difficult to Differentiate
Only if they are seafood (you).

 

wb
AlanL907
50%
50%
AlanL907,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/16/2016 | 1:55:54 PM
Re: Difficult to Differentiate
I though all offers of free dinners from vendors were phishing.

It's 99.99% assured.
rjones2818
50%
50%
rjones2818,
User Rank: Strategist
2/11/2016 | 1:43:51 PM
Speaking of particularly
- "Unfortunately, a particularly message doesn't need to be the worst, sneakiest, or most clever in order to be successful," says Angela Knox, senior director of engineering and threat research at Cloudmark.-

A jarringly unfortunate use of the term particularly.

Sorry...it was jarring.
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/11/2016 | 11:24:55 AM
Difficult to Differentiate
For me, phishing has made it nearly impossible to discern what offers are legimitate and which ones are not. My only saving grace is that I verify the sender before hand but even that has the potential to be spoofed.

I've probably turned down a bunch of genuine free dinners just because I thought they were phishing. :)
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/11/2016 | 11:20:58 AM
Greatest source of risk
It all comes down to employees and end users being the greatest source of risk. No matter what walls you've set up, if someone opens the gate then it was all for naught.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-1927
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0 to 2.4.41, redirects configured with mod_rewrite that were intended to be self-referential might be fooled by encoded newlines and redirect instead to an an unexpected URL within the request URL.
CVE-2020-8144
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
The UniFi Video Server v3.9.3 and prior (for Windows 7/8/10 x64) web interface Firmware Update functionality, under certain circumstances, does not validate firmware download destinations to ensure they are within the intended destination directory tree. It accepts a request with a URL to firmware u...
CVE-2020-8145
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
The UniFi Video Server (Windows) web interface configuration restore functionality at the “backup� and “wizard� endpoints does not implement sufficient privilege checks. Low privileged users, belonging to the PUBLIC_GROUP ...
CVE-2020-8146
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
In UniFi Video v3.10.1 (for Windows 7/8/10 x64) there is a Local Privileges Escalation to SYSTEM from arbitrary file deletion and DLL hijack vulnerabilities. The issue was fixed by adjusting the .tsExport folder when the controller is running on Windows and adjusting the SafeDllSearchMode in the win...
CVE-2020-6009
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
LearnDash Wordpress plugin version below 3.1.6 is vulnerable to Unauthenticated SQL Injection.