Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

2/4/2016
09:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The #1 Riskiest Mobile Users Wear Suits

Business users top the rankings of those most likely to engage with risky apps and URLs on their smartphones and tablets.

As mobile malware continues to grow into a legitimate threat, some users are proving more prone than others to being subject to attack. According to a new survey out this week, the demographic most likely to routinely engage in risky mobile behavior isn't youngsters on Snapchat or 'digitally hooked' users who consume vast quantities of mobile video and entertainment. Instead, the most risky users are businesspeople.

The Allot Mobile Trends report took a subjective look during a week-long period at a random sample of 500,000 mobile users on Android, iOS, and Windows Phone platforms. The researchers examined their behaviors according to the potential riskiness of the mobile apps and URLs they frequented on mobile devices, paired up against their demographic information. With the help of Kaspersky Lab, Allot sliced and diced the top 500 apps and 500 URLs frequented by these users not only by riskines, but also by type of content. Doing so gave them a better picture of how user demographics and mobile habits make certain populations more likely to having their phones, tablets, and other mobile devices compromised.

Across the board, the study found among all user activity, about one in every 30 mobile browsing transactions was potentially risky, while one in every seven mobile app sessions was risky. The study found that about 64% of men used potentially risky apps at least once every 24 hours compared to 42% of women. When broken down by age and gender, 63% of young females and 65% of young and millennial males use risky apps at least once a day. By contrast, only about 42% of millennial females and 31% Gen X and Baby Boomer females do the same.

Interestingly, when broken down by business versus non-business use, business users are twice as likely to use potentially risky apps than the average across all of the profiles examined. Approximately 67% of businesswomen and 79% of business men used risky apps at least once a day.

"This could be fueled by the tendency for business people to use smartphones and tablets for both business activities and personal use, increasing the variety of content and number of transactions they engage in regularly," the report speculated. "Often, their security demarcations are blurred."

The other guess is that mobile devices are less likely to be monitored and managed than business PCs and laptops.

"Smartphone users can download and use any App they choose, and often, they can browse to URLs that are blocked on the company network," the report said. "This freedom exposes business people to more cyber risk and can open a backdoor for malware to infect business networks."

Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about mobile securtiy at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Register today and receive an early bird discount of $200.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11494
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
An issue was discovered in slc_bump in drivers/net/can/slcan.c in the Linux kernel through 5.6.2. It allows attackers to read uninitialized can_frame data, potentially containing sensitive information from kernel stack memory, if the configuration lacks CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL, aka CID-b9258a2cece4.
CVE-2020-7619
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
get-git-data through 1.3.1 is vulnerable to Command Injection. It is possible to inject arbitrary commands as part of the arguments provided to get-git-data.
CVE-2020-7620
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
pomelo-monitor through 0.3.7 is vulnerable to Command Injection.It allows injection of arbitrary commands as part of 'pomelo-monitor' params.
CVE-2020-7621
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
strong-nginx-controller through 1.0.2 is vulnerable to Command Injection. It allows execution of arbitrary command as part of the '_nginxCmd()' function.
CVE-2020-7623
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-02
jscover through 1.0.0 is vulnerable to Command Injection. It allows execution of arbitrary command via the source argument.