Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

6/17/2015
01:40 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Smart Cities', IoT's Key Challenges: Security, Lack of Standards

London Technology Week: At IFSEC, futurologist Simon Moores asks who's responsible when a smart city crashes.

“Who’s responsible when a smart city crashes?”

Futurologist Dr. Simon Moores asked this question during his keynote session at IFSEC London today, but had no answer.

"Smart cities" like Songdo, Korea, are full of Internet-of-things devices -- smart electric meters, street lights that adjust to the number of people on streets, RFID chips to monitor traffic flow or even to track how many recyclable items are being properly disposed of. Every smart building may be full of IoT devices running elevators, lighting, security, and HVAC systems.

"Integrating an entire city full of these networks presents an almost intractable problem," Moore said.

The Internet of Things still faces "two really, really big challenges," he said:  security and a lack of standards. 

It creates another avenue for attacks, and the attack surface is huge, Moores said. He pointed out that the problem of "forever day" vulnerabilities -- holes in legacy systems that manufacturers no longer patch -- also become a greater threat.

However, the bigger trouble may come from the big data generated by all these smart devices. "The value isn’t in the IoT at all," said Moores. "[And] … the real value is in the ability to apply the data from the sensors at the endpoints."

As the amount and value of this data increases, its value as an attack target could increase -- both attacks that steal private information or manipulate it and damage its integrity. As Moores explains, the persistent collection of data about people's movements also raises privacy concerns -- something that some cities citizens' are beginning to push back against.

"I don't yet see a similar effort in London," said Moores, "which is becoming a world-class surveillance city."

Until now, Moores said, smart city development has focused on technology, not people; cost-savings, not security; and top-down, not bottom-up approaches. A “long, messy, and incremental process” is ahead, he said, and the winners and losers will depend upon how well they can adapt.

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19767
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The Linux kernel before 5.4.2 mishandles ext4_expand_extra_isize, as demonstrated by use-after-free errors in __ext4_expand_extra_isize and ext4_xattr_set_entry, related to fs/ext4/inode.c and fs/ext4/super.c, aka CID-4ea99936a163.
CVE-2019-19768
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
In the Linux kernel 5.4.0-rc2, there is a use-after-free (read) in the __blk_add_trace function in kernel/trace/blktrace.c (which is used to fill out a blk_io_trace structure and place it in a per-cpu sub-buffer).
CVE-2019-19769
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
In the Linux kernel 5.3.10, there is a use-after-free (read) in the perf_trace_lock_acquire function (related to include/trace/events/lock.h).
CVE-2019-19770
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
In the Linux kernel 4.19.83, there is a use-after-free (read) in the debugfs_remove function in fs/debugfs/inode.c (which is used to remove a file or directory in debugfs that was previously created with a call to another debugfs function such as debugfs_create_file).
CVE-2019-19771
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The lodahs package 0.0.1 for Node.js is a Trojan horse, and may have been installed by persons who mistyped the lodash package name. In particular, the Trojan horse finds and exfiltrates cryptocurrency wallets.