Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

3/9/2018
02:55 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Slingshot' Cyber Espionage Campaign Hacks Network Routers

Advanced hacking group appears to be native English speakers targeting Africa, Middle East.

KASPERSKY SECURITY ANALYST SUMMIT 2018 – Cancun, Mexico – A newly discovered nation-state cyber espionage campaign targeting Africa and the Middle East infects network routers in order to snare administrative credentials from its targets and then move freely throughout the network.

Kaspersky Lab researchers unearthed the stealthy and highly sophisticated operation - named "Slingshot" after a word found in the attack code – that has infected at least 100 victims since at least 2012, with nearly half in Kenya, and the rest in Yemen, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Tanzania, Greece, Jordan, Somalia, Tunisia, Turkey, Mauritius, and the United Arab Emirates. The attackers ultimately gain kernel-mode access to victim machines where they then gather screenshots, network information, keyboard data, passwords, USB connections, and other activity and data.

Just how Slingshot initially compromises the target's network routers is unclear, but Kaspersky researchers say the goal is to gain access to valuable systems admin credentials that then give the attackers a foothold in the network. Slingshot targets MikroTik routers, dropping a malicious dynamic link library (DLL) on the devices that serves as a downloader for other malware. Then when a router admin accesses the router, his or her machine gets silently compromised via the infected router. 

Router hacking is a relatively rare attack vector, but it's an effective one for hackers. Malicious code can sit on these perimeter devices unnoticed because few security tools can detect it. "We think the developers of the malware decided to infect the victims from routers because they wanted to stay undetected," said Alexey Shulmin, lead malware analyst, Kaspersky Lab, in an interview. "A compromised router can be very hard to detect … During the past years, we have seen several high-profile cases where router malware was involved."

Shulmin said router security is typically a "blind spot" for organizations. "We are probably only seeing the tip of the iceberg" in router compromises, he said.

In the case of Slingshot, the attackers appear to have been fishing for systems admins to infect and then use their credentials to move laterally. "Once you infect the systems admin, then it becomes quite easy to move through the network. They have access to everything," said Costin Raiu, head of Kaspersky Lab's global research and analysis team.

Just how the Slingshot attackers actually infected the routers remains a mystery, but the researchers believe an exploit was used to abuse a vulnerability in the MikroTik router software. Once it infects the system admin and spreads to victim machines, it embeds malware in the kernel of the operating system. MikroTik has patched the flaw, so updated routers aren't vulnerable to this particular attack.

That method indicates that it's an especially well-resourced and advanced attack group behind the attack. "Nowadays, it's getting harder and harder to get into kernel mode because most [OSes] support technologies where you can't load a driver into kernel mode," Shulmin noted.

The attackers also install code that allows them to store their stolen data such as keylogger files, system information, and other data encrypted on the victim's hard drive for convenient access.

Slingshot also encrypts and hides its network traffic among legitimate network traffic using a so-called passive network-driven backdoor, typically a server directly connected to the Internet that sits there silently awaiting remote instructions from the attackers. "We've seen this [method] before with the Lamberts family," namely the White Lambert and Grey Lambert hacking teams, Raiu said.

The researchers aren't sure who is behind the attacks, but there are some intriguing clues they found: Slingshot appears to be a native English-speaking group that employs techniques reminiscent of the Russian-speaking Turla, Equation Group's (aka the NSA)'s Grayfish platform, and tools from White Lambert, thought to be a CIA hacking team. "Both the White Lambert and Grey Lambert threats use the same mechanism as Slingshot; they try to exploit vulnerable drivers to deliver their code into kernel mode," Shulmin said.

Even so, the researcher said there's no solid link between Slingshot and the Lamberts. "We have no solid links with Equation Group and the Lamberts," Raiu said.

Another fun fact: the attackers appear to be fans of "Lord of the Rings," given the names Gollum and Smeagol found in malware modules.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Asia returns to Singapore with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.
CVE-2019-19011
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
MiniUPnP ngiflib 0.4 has a NULL pointer dereference in GifIndexToTrueColor in ngiflib.c via a file that lacks a palette.
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.