Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

1/17/2019
10:30 AM
Igal Gofman
Igal Gofman
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Simulating Lateral Attacks Through Email

A skilled attacker can get inside your company by abusing common email applications. Here are three strategies to block them.

A big portion of breaching an organization's infrastructure involves challenging normal procedures and processes. A red team's main purpose is to simulate adversary activities and help the security administrators understand, monitor, and remediate the threats.

As a security researcher, I'm constantly looking for new ways to simulate advanced lateral movement, sophisticated Active Directory escalation, persistence, and exfiltration. One of our recent areas of focus has been on defeating network and domain boundaries by moving laterally within the network, with a focus on pivoting from unsecured networks to isolated secure networks.

One of the most common attack methods used by all adversaries is email, mostly because of the ease of use. Phishing attacks have always been a major source of worry for organizations. Over the last year, we have witnessed more organizations and individuals targeted by phishing campaigns designed to capture an employee's login credentials. Recently, the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) issued a warning regarding some of those threats targeting the online payroll accounts of employees in a variety of industries.

My team and I decided to dig deeper into simulating how a skilled adversary can easily pivot to a compromised network segment by abusing commonly used email applications. Many email clients are built right into modern operating systems and can potentially help facilitate lateral movement.

The techniques described here are considered as post-exploitation, which means the user account has been breached and the adversary has full control over the user's workstation.

In many cases, adversaries use compromised account credentials to access employees' email in order to change their bank account information, sometimes adding a malicious Outlook rule to prevent the user from receiving alerts regarding a deposit or withdraw change. There are many account breach vectors, including phishing and password spraying.

By performing a phishing campaign, the adversary can easily gain system access to a user's workstation and can obviously control the installed mail client and all related communication. Instead of targeting users outside the organization by sending phishing emails or using cloud services to sync malicious metadata, the adversary can control all communication. Let's take this concept one step further to see how local access to an email client advances our agenda to pivot from network to network.

Use Case 1
Many times, advanced adversaries establish an internal command and control server (commonly referred to as a C2 server) to be used as a jump server to the outside world. The jump server can act as middleware between the infected workstations and an external C2 server. The internal C2 server can also be used as a man-in-the-middle proxy or a watering hole site. The adversaries can easily manipulate all mail hyperlinks shared by the compromised user/workstation to redirect the recipients to an internal watering hole website, bypassing many of the link detection and firewall application control mechanisms.

Use Case 2
Let's look at how we can build on top a known attack technique "fileshare infection" to pivot on an internal network using a compromised mail application. First, the adversaries must have the ability to weaponize a legitimate file. They would do this by focusing on widely used shared files by email platforms. There are many exploit options available online for free, including Office documents, PDF documents, and archive file vulnerabilities.

Now imagine what happens when a user's workstation is compromised. We all know many users love to share documents with their colleagues through email. The attacker has gained full control over email communication and can now inject malicious code into legitimate office files. These malicious files are now shared over a legitimate mail channel, which means that the adversaries use actual email correspondence instead of faking and acting on behalf of the user. The user would then reply or create a new email message using the malicious file. The mail recipient does not suspect that anything is wrong and opens the malicious file, exploiting the responsible file application.

As collateral damage, they can dump the global address book of the company and conduct a targeted phishing campaign against high-value targets such as IT or executive management.

Use Case 3
Instead of exploiting vulnerabilities in common files as described above, an adversary can use a much stealthier technique to leak credentials in the form of NTLM hashes to an internal C2 server. Usually, this is achieved by silently forcing a file application to authenticate against the C2 server using a specific protocol such as Server Message Block (SMB). The adversary can use the C2 to relay the received authentication attempt to any network protocol supporting NTLM authentication.

Microsoft has issued an optional security enhancement (Microsoft Advisory ADV170014) that provides organizations with the ability to disable NTLM single sign-on authentication as a method for public resources. However, this method is usually inefficient for internal resource communication, and in many cases will allow an internal network boundary bypass. A much more efficient way to mitigate this threat is by forcing NTLM signing on client and servers.

All the above examples show how linking several existing techniques together can be combined into one or more complex attack flows to achieve lateral movement and pivoting inside a network. Our team has demonstrated that this approach together with scalable automation is highly efficient and can be used to gain control over critical targets in real enterprise environments.

Related Content:

Igal Gofman is Head of Security Research at XM Cyber. He has a proven track record in network security, research-oriented development, and threat intelligence. His research interests include network security, intrusion detection, operating systems, and Active Directory. Prior ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-3154
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (Zend_Mail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.
CVE-2019-17190
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A Local Privilege Escalation issue was discovered in Avast Secure Browser 76.0.1659.101. The vulnerability is due to an insecure ACL set by the AvastBrowserUpdate.exe (which is running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) when AvastSecureBrowser.exe checks for new updates. When the update check is triggered, the...
CVE-2014-8161
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive column values by triggering constraint violation and then reading the error message.
CVE-2014-9481
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The Scribunto extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to obtain the rollback token and possibly other sensitive information via a crafted module, related to unstripping special page HTML.
CVE-2015-0241
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The to_char function in PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a (1) large number of digits when processing a numeric ...