Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

11/10/2016
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Shoppers Up Their Online Security Game, Survey Says

While they check SSL certificates and liability policies more often, many remain wary of biometric authentication, Computop reports

Almost three-quarters of consumers – 71% -- said they check that an ecommerce site they shop on is protected via SSL and https, according to a new survey of over 1,900 consumers in the US and UK. In addition, 61% claim they checked the liability policy of their preferred payment method provider or bank in the case of fraud.

Despite those precautions, 62% say they won't be shopping online on Cyber Monday this year (Nov. 28). But that self-restraint isn't because of security concerns; shoppers will shun online buying this year because the deals aren't as good as they used to be, according to Computop, a secure payments provider that sponsored the study.

Respondents were also asked which biometric features they'd use for authentication; fingerprints was the top choice (35%), followed by retinal scans (12%), voice recognition (7%), and selfie photo (2%). But 41% rejected biometric authentication altogether.

Consumers, particularly those in Europe, are concerned about how biometric data is secured, according to Andre Malinowski, head of international business at Computop. "This data must be stored safely, otherwise it will open up new areas of identification theft," he added.

Malinowski was pleased to see that so many consumers are looking for SSL certificates but said more education is needed to combat fraud. "We have to continue finding ways to making online shopping safer," he said.

But there's a disconnect in the Computop data, in that despite greater consumer awareness around security and liability, consumers aren't wholeheartedly embracing online payment plans or sharing as much personal information online. There's also a disconnect between the behavior reported to surveyors and the actual consumer behavior, according to John Pironti, president of security consultancy IP Architects LLC. "When you crosscut the conversations and go back to retailers' numbers, online sales keep going up," he said. "While good security is always the intention, convenience always trumps security for a consumer."

The high percentage of respondents who claim to know their online payment provider's liability policy is also dubious, Pironti added. "UK and European consumers tend to pay more attention to privacy and bank fraud policies because they understand they may be liable," he explained. "But in the US, they tell you in the ads you're only liable for the first $50."

Other key points from the Computop survey:

  • 74% said they are concerned about security when disclosing credit card and bank information online;
  • 57% said they wouldn't shop at a retailer that had recently experienced a data breach;
  • When shopping online, 41% of respondents rejected the option of paying at the physical store when picking up their order;
  • US consumers trust their credit cards the most (59%), while UK consumers trust PayPal more (50%);
  • 26% are concerned that their biometric data could be spoofed;
  • 19% felt the benefits outweighed the risks when sharing biometric data for payment authentication.

Related Content:

 

Terry Sweeney is a Los Angeles-based writer and editor who has covered technology, networking, and security for more than 20 years. He was part of the team that started Dark Reading and has been a contributor to The Washington Post, Crain's New York Business, Red Herring, ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/30/2020
'Act of War' Clause Could Nix Cyber Insurance Payouts
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  10/29/2020
6 Ways Passwords Fail Basic Security Tests
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  10/28/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How to Measure and Reduce Cybersecurity Risk in Your Organization
In this Tech Digest, we examine the difficult practice of measuring cyber-risk that has long been an elusive target for enterprises. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15703
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-31
There is no input validation on the Locale property in an apt transaction. An unprivileged user can supply a full path to a writable directory, which lets aptd read a file as root. Having a symlink in place results in an error message if the file exists, and no error otherwise. This way an unprivile...
CVE-2020-5991
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-30
NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit, all versions prior to 11.1.1, contains a vulnerability in the NVJPEG library in which an out-of-bounds read or write operation may lead to code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure.
CVE-2020-15273
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-30
baserCMS before version 4.4.1 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. The issue affects the following components: Edit feed settings, Edit widget area, Sub site new registration, New category registration. Arbitrary JavaScript may be executed by entering specific characters in the account that can ac...
CVE-2020-15276
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-30
baserCMS before version 4.4.1 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting. Arbitrary JavaScript may be executed by entering a crafted nickname in blog comments. The issue affects the blog comment component. It is fixed in version 4.4.1.
CVE-2020-15277
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-30
baserCMS before version 4.4.1 is affected by Remote Code Execution (RCE). Code may be executed by logging in as a system administrator and uploading an executable script file such as a PHP file. The Edit template component is vulnerable. The issue is fixed in version 4.4.1.