Endpoint

3/14/2018
02:00 PM
John Moynihan
John Moynihan
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Segmentation: The Neglected (Yet Essential) Control

Failure to deploy measures to contain unauthorized intruders is a recipe for digital disaster.

Throughout the past decade, the information security profession has pursued an approach centered around protecting the network perimeter. While this proactive strategy has become the foundation of most enterprise programs, organizations must be equally capable of reacting to attacks by containing intruders once they have entered the network.

Although identifying and mitigating perimeter threats is essential, the fact remains that cybercriminals and nation-state actors are, with alarming frequency, defeating the most-hardened networks. Therefore, it is imperative that practitioners acknowledge this dynamic and deploy containment measures to isolate intrusions.

Network segmentation is a critical weapon in the escalating battle to protect against unauthorized access.

Segmentation
The vast majority of cyberattacks originate within the most vulnerable area of an organization, the user environment. Once the initial compromise occurs through the use of stolen credentials or the successful delivery of a social engineering overture, those launching the attack enjoy a foothold from which to search for critical platforms and sensitive data. By dividing a network into segments and restricting lateral access, security teams are capable of containing intruders and dramatically reducing the entity's attack surface.

When intruders enter an inadequately segmented, or "flat," network, they often enjoy unbridled movement and will eventually gain access to payment applications, sensitive databases, and critical infrastructure systems. Through segmentation, these critical technologies may be isolated and thereby protected.

Although many high-profile and destructive cyber campaigns have been attributed to poor segmentation, perhaps the most widely reported incident was the 2013 Target breach. According to multiple sources, a group based in Eastern Europe breached the retailer's perimeter by first stealing credentials from one of the company's service providers, an HVAC vendor. 

Once inside the system that monitors Target's heating and air conditioning functions, the cybercriminals were able to proceed, without detection, to the point-of-sale environment. Ultimately, malware was installed on approximately 36,000 payment terminals, allowing for the hackers to steal 40 million credit and debit card numbers from unsuspecting shoppers.

This scenario is the digital equivalent of a bank robber entering the lobby of a major financial institution and proceeding, unimpeded and without being noticed, to a vault containing its customers most-valuable items.

The Path Forward
Management has long avoided the deployment of comprehensive network segmentation due to a variety resource and operability concerns. Recently, however, dramatic advances in enterprise software solutions provide practitioners with scalable, customized options to address this issue.

Prior to implementing a segmentation strategy, a clear consensus must be reached regarding an organization's sensitive data and critical platforms. Given that isolating these environments will be the ultimate goal, there can be no ambiguity on this issue. Also, it is necessary to map the existing communication paths and application dependencies within the network. Once these preliminary tasks have been completed, the following segmentation options may be considered:

Environmental: Isolates the most vulnerable environments, such as user and development, from the rest of the network and prevents intruders from breaching the low-hanging fruit and then moving laterally. This is known as the "coarsest" form of segmentation and should exist in every organization.

Application: Ensures that certain high-value applications are insulated from all others and provides an additional roadblock for attackers attempting to travel across applications.

Process: The "finest-grain" form of segmentation ensures that only active communications channels may be used and prevents any use of dormant paths.    

The rapidly evolving nature of the cyber-threat landscape requires adaptive information security professionals. Although preventing intrusions is, and should remain, a primary goal, failure to deploy measures to contain unauthorized intruders is a recipe for digital disaster.

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at #InteropITX. Check out the security track agenda here, then register! Early Bird Rates expire Friday March 16. Use Promo Code DR200 & save $200. 

John Moynihan, CGEIT, CRISC, is President of Minuteman Governance, a Massachusetts cybersecurity consultancy that provides services to public and private sector clients throughout the United States. Prior to founding this firm, he was CISO at the Massachusetts Department of ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
dstory752
100%
0%
dstory752,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/16/2018 | 11:50:25 AM
Segmentation vs Convergence
Segmentation becomes a 'hard sell' when many organizations are hell-bent on network convergence, at any cost.  The cost is usually paid for in the form of a data breach.
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Number of Retailers Impacted by Breaches Doubles
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer, Dark Reading,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14505
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-22
mitmweb in mitmproxy v4.0.3 allows DNS Rebinding attacks, related to tools/web/app.py.
CVE-2018-14500
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-22
joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has XSS via the manager/collect/collect_vod_zhuiju.php keyword parameter.
CVE-2018-14501
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-22
manager/admin_ajax.php in joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has SQL Injection, as demonstrated by crafted POST data beginning with an "m_id=1 AND SLEEP(5)" substring.
CVE-2018-14492
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-21
Tenda AC7 through V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 through V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, and AC10 through V15.03.06.23_CN devices have a Stack-based Buffer Overflow via a long limitSpeed or limitSpeedup parameter to an unspecified /goform URI.
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.