Endpoint

2/11/2019
01:45 PM
100%
0%

Security Pros Agree Military Should Conduct Offensive Hacking

But it can't operate in a bubble, a new Washington Post study indicates.

It has been nearly six months since the Trump administration issued an order granting the military more authority to launch offensive cyber operations against American enemies. Sixty percent of cybersecurity experts approve of the decision, a new Washington Post study indicates.

Researchers polled The Network, a group of 100-plus government, business, and academic leaders who weigh in on security topics. Most applauded the government's decision to let the defense secretary authorize offensive hacking. Several arguments supported the move, which was called "common sense" and "long overdue" among supporters. When used in combination with other military tactics, cyber operations can level the playing field, said one respondent.

Still, even those who back the government's plan are wary of giving the military power to deploy offensive measures without communicating with other government agencies. The 40% of respondents who disagreed with the decision voiced the same worries. Acting solo, the military could launch operations that cause harm to US businesses or intelligence operations.

Collaboration is imperative if the military is going to launch attacks against foreign enemies, disapprovers said. Operations should first be vetted to ensure it doesn't interfere with foreign policies, law enforcement, and the United States' alliances and long-term interests. Many also fear if the US launches offensive attacks, its targets could respond with threats of their own.

Read more details here.

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
traininganddevelopment
50%
50%
traininganddevelopment,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/16/2019 | 1:34:40 AM
HR Assignment Help
Very informative article. This information has to know by everybody.

HR Assignment Help
nelly.bs
50%
50%
nelly.bs,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/13/2019 | 10:07:17 AM
Re: Collaboration in government
The 40% of respondents who disagreed with the decision voiced the same worries. Acting solo, the military could launch operations that cause harm to US businesses or intelligence operations.
REISEN1955
100%
0%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
2/11/2019 | 2:17:19 PM
Collaboration in government
Good idea - does the CIA still discuss with FBI and v-versa?  Doubt it.
New Free Tool Scans for Chrome Extension Safety
Dark Reading Staff 2/21/2019
Making the Case for a Cybersecurity Moon Shot
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  2/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6485
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-22
Citrix NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before build 50.31, 12.0 before build 60.9, 11.1 before build 60.14, 11.0 before build 72.17, and 10.5 before build 69.5 and Application Delivery Controller (ADC) 12.1 before build 50.31, 12.0 before build 60.9, 11.1 before build 60.14, 11.0 before build 72.17, and 10.5...
CVE-2019-9020
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-22
An issue was discovered in PHP before 5.6.40, 7.x before 7.1.26, 7.2.x before 7.2.14, and 7.3.x before 7.3.1. Invalid input to the function xmlrpc_decode() can lead to an invalid memory access (heap out of bounds read or read after free). This is related to xml_elem_parse_buf in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc...
CVE-2019-9021
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-22
An issue was discovered in PHP before 5.6.40, 7.x before 7.1.26, 7.2.x before 7.2.14, and 7.3.x before 7.3.1. A heap-based buffer over-read in PHAR reading functions in the PHAR extension may allow an attacker to read allocated or unallocated memory past the actual data when trying to parse the file...
CVE-2019-9022
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-22
An issue was discovered in PHP 7.x before 7.1.26, 7.2.x before 7.2.14, and 7.3.x before 7.3.2. dns_get_record misparses a DNS response, which can allow a hostile DNS server to cause PHP to misuse memcpy, leading to read operations going past the buffer allocated for DNS data. This affects php_parser...
CVE-2019-9023
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-22
An issue was discovered in PHP before 5.6.40, 7.x before 7.1.26, 7.2.x before 7.2.14, and 7.3.x before 7.3.1. A number of heap-based buffer over-read instances are present in mbstring regular expression functions when supplied with invalid multibyte data. These occur in ext/mbstring/oniguruma/regcom...