Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint //

Privacy

5/7/2018
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Why DDoS Just Won't Die

Distributed denial-of-service attacks are getting bigger, badder, and 'blended.' What you can (and can't) do about that.

Most every organization has been affected by a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in some way: whether they were hit directly in a traffic-flooding attack, or if they suffered the fallout from one of their partners or suppliers getting victimized.

While DDoS carries less of a stigma than a data breach in the scheme of security threats, a powerful flooding attack can not only take down a company's network, but also its business. DDoS attacks traditionally have been employed either to merely disrupt the targeted organization, or as a cover for a more nefarious attack to spy on or steal data from an organization.

The April takedown by the UK National Crime Agency and Dutch National Police and other officials of the world's largest online market for selling and launching DDoS attacks, Webstresser, was a big win for law enforcement. Webstresser boasted more than 136,000 registered users and supported some four million DDoS attacks worldwide.

But in the end, Webstresser's demise isn't likely to make much of a dent in DDoS attack activity, experts say. Despite reports that the takedown led to a significant decline in DDoS attacks, Corero Network Security saw DDoS attacks actually rise on average in the second half of the month of April. "Our own evidence is that attack volumes globally and in Europe have, if anything, increased in the week since the Europol take-down action," said Andrew Lloyd, president of Corero.

Even without a mega DDoS service, it's still inexpensive to wage a DDoS attack. According to Symantec, DDoS bot software starts as low as a dollar to $15, and less than one-hour of a DDoS via a service can go from $5 to $20; a longer attack (more than 24 hours) against a more protected target, costs anywhere from $10 to $100.

And bots are becoming even easier to amass and in bigger numbers, as Internet of Things (IoT) devices are getting added to the arsenal. According to the Spamhaus Botnet Threat Report, the number of IoT botnet controllers more than doubled last year. Think Mirai, the IoT botnet that in October of 2016 took down managed DNS provider Dyn, taking with it big names like Amazon, Netflix, Twitter, Github, Okta, and Yelp – with an army of 100,000 IoT bots.

Sean Tierney, director of cyber intelligence at Infoblox, says botnets increasingly will be comprised of both traditional endpoints—Windows PCs and laptops—as well as IoT devices. "They are going to be blended," he said in an interview. "It's going to be harder to tell the difference" in bots.

The wave of consumer products with IP connections without software or firmware update capabilities will exacerbate the botnet problem, according to Tierney.

While IoT botnets appear to be the thing of the future, some attackers have been waging old-school DDoS attacks: in the first quarter of this year, a long-tail DDoS attack lasted more than 12 days, according to new Kaspersky Lab research. That type of longevity for a DDoS was last seen in 2015.

Hardcore heavy DDoS attacks have been breaking records of late: the DDoS attack on Github recently, clocked at 1.35 terabytes, was broken a week later by a 1.7TB DDoS that abused the Memcached vulnerability against an undisclosed US service provider. "That Github [DDoS] record didn't even last a week," Tierney said in a presentation at Interop ITX in Las Vegas last week.

The DDoS attack employed Memcached servers exposed on the public Internet. Memcached, an open-source memory-caching system for storing data in RAM for speeding access times, doesn't include an authentication feature, so attackers were able to spoof requests and amplify their attack. If properly configured, a Memcached server sits behind firewalls or inside an organization.

"Memcached amplification attacks are just the beginning" of these jacked-up attacks, Tierney said. "Be ready for multi-vector attacks. Rate-limiting is good, but alone it's not enough. Get ready for scales of 900Mbps to 400Gbps to over a Terabyte."

Tierney recommended ways to prepare for a DDoS attack, including: 

  • Establish a security policy, including how you'll enact and enforce it
  • Track issues that are security risks
  • Enact a business continuity/disaster recovery plan
  • Employ good security hygiene
  • Create an incident response plan that operates hand-in-hand with a business continuity/disaster recovery plan
  • Have a multi-pronged response plan, so that while you're being DDoSed, your data isn't also getting stolen in the background
  • Execute tabletop attack exercises
  • Hire external penetration tests
  • Conduct user security awareness and training
  • Change all factory-default passwords in devices
  • Know your supply chain and any potential risks they bring
  • Use DDoS traffic scrubbers, DDoS mitigation services

  

Related Content:

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25821
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** peg-markdown 0.4.14 has a NULL pointer dereference in process_raw_blocks in markdown_lib.c. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
CVE-2020-3130
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
A vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco Unity Connection could allow an authenticated remote attacker to overwrite files on the underlying filesystem. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP re...
CVE-2020-3133
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
A vulnerability in the email message scanning of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured filters on the device. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of incoming emails. An attacker could exploit t...
CVE-2020-3135
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based...
CVE-2020-3137
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected device. The vulnerability exists because th...