Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint //


06:15 PM
Connect Directly

UN Report Warns Encryption Backdoors Violate Human Rights

Report says States should be promoting strong encryption and anonymity tools, not restricting them.

Encryption is essential to protecting a variety of human rights, and nation-states should avoid all measures to weaken it, according to a report released today by the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The document, written by UN Special Rapporteur David Kaye, was based upon questionnaire responses submitted by 16 States, opinions submitted by 30 non-government stakeholders, and statements made at a meeting of experts in Geneva in March.

According to the report, encryption and anonymity tools (like VPNs, proxies, and onion routing) are both necessary to ensuring individuals' privacy, freedom of opinion, freedom of expression, and freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas. All of these rights are protected under and described by the UN's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which 168 states are party, and the UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

Yet, law enforcement and intelligence agencies in a variety of countries, including the United States, are trying to institute restrictions on encryption, arguing that it jeopardizes their efforts to protect national security and bring criminals to justice. 

[Although law enforcement is asking for "indulgence on the subject of encryption," cloud providers, mobile device manufacturers, and lawmakers aren't ready to oblige. See "Law Enforcement Finding Few Allies on Encryption."]

According to the UN's report, "States should avoid all measures that weaken the security that individuals may enjoy online, such as backdoors, weak encryption standards and key escrows."

It even goes so far as to suggest "States should promote strong encryption and anonymity" [emphasis added].

Some of the reasons it's so important:

The report points out that while freedom of expression gets plenty of attention, greater attention must be paid to freedom of ideas, because "the mechanics of holding opinions have evolved in the digital age and exposed individuals to significant vulnerabilities."

Whereas ideas might once have just been stored in one's mind or jotted down in a bedside diary or private letters, now ideas are scattered around places like browser histories, e-mail archives, and mandatory surveys on web registration pages. Ideas thus become concrete, instead of abstract, which changes the scope of surveillance, criminalization, harassment, and defamation that can happen in relation to opinions.

Encryption and anonymity technology could help individuals protect their rights; and by proxy, help the nations that are obligated to help them protect those rights. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not only protects individuals against "arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy ... or correspondence" and "unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation," it also states that “everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”

"Such protection must include the right to a remedy for a violation," the report states. "In order for the right to a remedy to be meaningful, individuals must be given notice of any compromise of their privacy through, for instance, weakened encryption or compelled disclosure of user data."

The report also points out that some countries base their censorship efforts on keyword searches, and that encryption enables individuals to avoid that kind of filtering. 

"The trend lines regarding security and privacy online are deeply worrying," the report says. "States often fail to provide public justification to support restrictions. Encrypted and anonymous communications may frustrate law enforcement and counter-terrorism officials, and they complicate surveillance, but State authorities have not generally identified situations — even in general terms, given the potential need for confidentiality — where a restriction has been necessary to achieve a legitimate goal. States downplay the value of traditional non-digital tools in law enforcement and counter-terrorism efforts, including transnational cooperation  ...

"Efforts to restrict encryption and anonymity also tend to be quick reactions to terrorism, even when the attackers themselves are not alleged to have used encryption or anonymity to plan or carry out an attack."

The UN Human Rights Council, in the report, advises against any restrictions on encryption and anonymity technologies, but acknowledges that if restrictions must happen, they meet several requirements:

Any restriction must be "precise, public, transparent and avoid providing State authorities with unbounded discretion to apply the limitation." Limitations must only be justified to protect specified interests. States must prove any restriction is "necessary" to achieve and legitimate objective, and release that restriction as soon as that objective is complete. By "necessary," the report means that the restriction must be the least intrusive measure available and proportional to the severity of the objective. 

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
6/1/2015 | 11:58:48 PM
Re: Keys to the Kingdom
Well, major provisions of the PATRIOT Act have expired, at least.

For now.  The USA Freedom Act (hah) seems inevitable regardless, despite Rand Paul's efforts -- as national security hawks try to weaken the privacy protections in it.  :/
User Rank: Ninja
5/31/2015 | 11:25:06 PM
Re: Keys to the Kingdom
I very much agree. We have always been trying to claw our way out of the snow and sending out rescue missions with little hope. But from those instances procedures are formulated to try and minimize risk for the next go around. Unfortunately, some need to be burned by the stove before they learn not to touch it.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2015 | 11:05:35 PM
Re: Keys to the Kingdom
I don't think it's a slippery slope; I think it's we've already fallen off the mountain beneath an avalanche.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2015 | 11:05:04 PM
Re: good luck
The funny thing about other countries' calls for more privacy in the wake of the Snowden revelations was that it came out that all those other countries do the same thing.  :p
User Rank: Ninja
5/29/2015 | 1:25:34 PM
Keys to the Kingdom
It seems that law enforcement is asking for keys to the kingdom. Allowing encryption to the point where data is visible to law enforcement seems like an invasion of privacy. This is a slippery slope.
User Rank: Moderator
5/29/2015 | 11:12:51 AM
good luck
Good luck with that,it seems we are moving in the exact opposite direction.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
jpv (aka Json Pattern Validator) before 2.2.2 does not properly validate input, as demonstrated by a corrupted array.
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
TinyMCE before 4.9.7 and 5.x before 5.1.4 allows XSS in the core parser, the paste plugin, and the visualchars plugin by using the clipboard or APIs to insert content into the editor.
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
FusionCompute 8.0.0 have local privilege escalation vulnerability. A local, authenticated attacker could perform specific operations to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the attacker to obtain a higher privilege and compromise the service.
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
HUAWEI Mate 30 with versions earlier than have a denial of service vulnerability. The system does not properly limit the depth of recursion, an attacker should trick the user installing and execute a malicious application. Successful exploit could cause a denial of service co...
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
HUAWEI P30 versions Versions earlier than;HUAWEI P30 Pro versions Versions earlier than have a denial of service vulnerability. Certain system configuration can be modified because of improper authorization. The attacker could trick the user installin...