Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

10/31/2017
10:05 AM
50%
50%

Phishing Kits Regularly Reused by Cybercriminals

In 27% of cases, a phishing kit is re-used on more than one host.

Phishing kits get re-used across multiple websites in 27% of cases, a new study shows.

All it takes to generate a new phishing kit is a single change to a file, the Duo Security report says. "Seeing so many unique phishing campaigns shows it is easy to make these kits and re-use them," says Jordan Wright, senior research and development engineer at Duo.

In its report - which examined 66,000 URLs over the course of a month and more than 7,800 phishing kits - researchers found two kits used on more than 30 hosts.

Re-using phishing kits ups the return on investment (ROI) for cybercriminals, who don't need to spend time to recreate various assets from a legitimate site to make a bogus one to steal users' credentials and information.

To create a phishing kit, attackers clone a legitimate site and alter the login page to point to a credential-stealing script, Duo notes in its report. The website's modified files, such as logos, images, and other features, are put into a zip file to create a phishing kit, which is then uploaded to the hacked website where the files are unzipped. The attacker then blasts out phishing emails, hoping to lure victims to click on the bogus malicious website.

"These kits are being used for commodity phishing, so the spoofed pages are not as convincing as spear phishing," Wright notes. "Some kits are bad and I don't think will fool anyone and some kits are almost exact replicas. The actors want to spoof large service providers like Gmail and get as many credentials as possible."

Typical phishing kit users include both beginners who favor the ease-of-use of the kits, as well as seasoned attackers who want to expand their phishing campaigns quickly, Wright explains.

Tracking the Bad Guys

And bad actors have no qualms when it comes to stealing from each other. Some of the phishing kits that were sold, traded, or offered for free had backdoor shells in the kits, allowing the initial phishing kit owner to pilfer any data gleaned from the new campaigns launched by the subsequent attacker.

"The backdoor also allows the author to run system commands on the host, so it can take over the host," Wright adds.

Duo also tracked the email addresses found in the phishing kits to correlate actors to specific campaigns and kits. As a result, they discovered 24% of the email addresses were tied to multiple phishing kits, according to the report.

One email address, wirez[@]googledocs[.]org, had more than 115 unique phishing kits to spoof multiple service providers.

The prevalence of phishing kits tracks with a general trend in cybercrime that is focusing on attacking the end-user as a means to get credentials to go deeper into the bowels of a company's network, rather than directly breaking into the network, Wright notes.

Duo, meanwhile, has released a free phishing tracking tool for others to use.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8144
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
The UniFi Video Server v3.9.3 and prior (for Windows 7/8/10 x64) web interface Firmware Update functionality, under certain circumstances, does not validate firmware download destinations to ensure they are within the intended destination directory tree. It accepts a request with a URL to firmware u...
CVE-2020-8145
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
The UniFi Video Server (Windows) web interface configuration restore functionality at the “backup� and “wizard� endpoints does not implement sufficient privilege checks. Low privileged users, belonging to the PUBLIC_GROUP ...
CVE-2020-8146
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
In UniFi Video v3.10.1 (for Windows 7/8/10 x64) there is a Local Privileges Escalation to SYSTEM from arbitrary file deletion and DLL hijack vulnerabilities. The issue was fixed by adjusting the .tsExport folder when the controller is running on Windows and adjusting the SafeDllSearchMode in the win...
CVE-2020-6009
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
LearnDash Wordpress plugin version below 3.1.6 is vulnerable to Unauthenticated SQL Injection.
CVE-2020-6096
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-01
An exploitable signed comparison vulnerability exists in the ARMv7 memcpy() implementation of GNU glibc 2.30.9000. Calling memcpy() (on ARMv7 targets that utilize the GNU glibc implementation) with a negative value for the 'num' parameter results in a signed comparison vulnerability. If an attacker ...