Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

8/31/2017
03:40 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

New Facebook, Instagram Bugs Demonstrate Social Media Risk

Security flaws in Facebook Messenger and Instagram let hackers propagate attacks and steal personal data.

Researchers at Kaspersky Lab recently discovered cyberattacks on Instagram and Facebook Messenger intended to steal credentials and spread malware, respectively. Both instances demonstrate the potential danger when an attacker seeks power in a social network.

The two attacks, while similar in their use of social networks, were otherwise different in nature. The Instagram attacks were manual and targeted high-profile victims. The Facebook campaign used advanced tactics to infect a large and indiscriminate pool of users.

Instagram's vulnerability exists in mobile version 8.5.1, which was released in 2016. Attackers can simply select "reset password," capture the request using a Web proxy, select a victim, and submit a request to Instagram's server with the target's unique identifier or username. The server returns a JSON response with the victim's personal data, like email and phone number.

"The attacks are quite labor intensive," Kaspersky Lab researchers explain. "Each one has to be done manually since Instagram uses mathematical calculations to prevent attackers from automating the request form."

Hackers were found on an underground forum exchanging personal credentials for celebrity accounts. Researchers reported the bug to Instagram on August 29; on August 30, the photo-sharing app had warned users of the vulnerability and issued a fix. Users are advised to update their apps to the latest version and alert Instagram to emails about password restoration.

David Jacoby, senior security researcher for Kaspersky Lab's Global Research and Analysis Team, picked up on the Facebook Messenger-driven malware when he received a suspicious note from a distant contact. Within minutes, he realized he had received an advanced form of multi-platform malware/adware, which was using multiple domains to prevent tracking.

Infected messages contain a shortened link, which leads victims to a Google Doc containing an image resembling a fake video player with the sender's profile photo. Google Chrome users who click the link are redirected to a fake YouTube page, which prompts them to download a fake Chrome extension. If installed, it spreads malicious links to the victims' online friends.

Chrome was the browser highlighted in a blog post co-authored by Jacoby and Frans Rosén, security advisor at Detectify, who was also investigating the Facebook malware. The two determined it was clear Chrome was a targeted browser for spreading the attack to other victims; in other browsers, ads were displayed and adware was downloaded on the victim's machine.

Jacoby and Rosén found several Chrome extensions were used in this campaign. All were newly created with stolen code, and similar names, to legitimate extensions. Each contained obfuscated background script that would only fetch an external URL if installed from the Chrome Webstore. Locally installed versions would not trigger an attack.

"The script would like a page on Facebook that was hardcoded in the script," researchers explain. "This was most likely used by the attackers to count the amount of infected users by keeping an eye on the amount of likes on this page."

Indeed, when observed, the "like" count quickly rose from 8,900 at one point to 32,000 a few hours later.

Google Chrome's security team disabled all malicious extensions to stop the spread of attack as much as possible; however, attackers had stolen all the access tokens from victims' accounts. This means attackers can still access these profiles, even if victims have changed their passwords, signed out, or disabled platform settings.

"We are currently discussing this with Facebook," Jacoby and Rosén report, "but at the moment it seems like there is no simple way for a victim to revoke the token the attackers stole."

The Facebook attack heavily relied on realistic social interactions, dynamic user content, and legitimate domains to spread. Researchers advise users to be careful when letting extensions control the bowser, and know which extensions they are running in the browser.

Tip: In Chrome, you can write chrome://extensions/ in your URL field to see a list of enabled extensions.

Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for more info and to register.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
8/31/2017 | 5:54:11 PM
Insta
Makes sense that the Instagram attacks only tended to target high-profile accounts. The damage one could do with the typical Instagram account is quite limited indeed (esp. w/ MFA).
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .