Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

10/24/2016
09:05 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft's New Patch Tuesday Model Comes With Benefits And Risks

Microsoft has transitioned its Patch Tuesday update process to a cumulative rollup model. What businesses need to know about the new patching regimen.

Microsoft as of this month officially transitioned its Patch Tuesday model to a cumulative patching process for Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 that security experts say is a more flexible and streamlined way to update vulnerable systems. But it also comes with some risks.

October 11 marked the first time Microsoft released updates via its new system, which combines security and non-security fixes into large bundles. Three distinct update bundles will roll out each month; two available to enterprise customers, and one for consumers.

On the second Tuesday of each month, otherwise known as Patch Tuesday, Microsoft will distribute two update batches.

One of these, for businesses and consumers, is released via Windows Update, Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), and the Windows Update Catalog. This is a monthly rollup of security and non-security fixes, which contains all updates for the month as well as fixes for the previous months. If a user skips a month, they will receive the patches for that month in the following month's bundle.

The second bundle contains all security patches for the specific month and excludes fixes from previous months. These security-only rollouts, intended for enterprise users, are distributed through WSUS and Windows Update Catalog.

"What Microsoft is trying to do is make things simpler for users by delivering all updates together," explains Amol Sarwate, director of vulnerability labs at Qualys. "When administrators install patches, they can just deploy one patch." This model also makes it easier to learn which fixes are included and which aren't, he adds.

On the third Tuesday, Microsoft will release a preview of non-security updates slated to arrive in the following month's rollup. This allows businesses to test updates on their systems and verify compatibility.

Sarwate explains how this new strategy is intended to streamline the update process for enterprise customers and give them the option to choose specific bundles. He advises organizations to take advantage of the opportunity to test new updates ahead of their release.

Microsoft's new update model also addresses problems businesses previously encountered when applying new security fixes.

"The main issue in the past has been that some users, mostly by mistake, didn't install all patches," explains Johannes Ullrich, dean of research at SANS Technology Institute. "This led to a very fragmented user base and increased the risk of new patches, as you couldn't be sure that all old patches were applied correctly."

Business systems are more tightly managed, he continues, and decisions are more carefully made as part of a controlled patch process. Organizations can delay patches for a particular month if they conflict with business-critical apps.

The Tradeoffs

While the change is intended to make patching simpler for enterprise users, experts agree there is still risk involved. 

"As someone who manages patching, I welcome the change," says Michael Gray, VP of tech at Thrive Networks. "The time spent researching every patch is exhaustive."

However, he continues, there is a risk of people not wanting to download these monolithic updates. What's more, the larger these bundles get, the more likely it is someone could compromise the entire package.

Ullrich acknowledges the new model will make patch application easier, but there is also risk related to availability.

"If a particular patch interferes with a particular function of the PC, either a hardware component or customer software, then the entire patch has to be delayed and it will not be advisable to just apply a partial patch," he explains. 

This further emphasizes the importance of patch testing, which may be a bit easier on the new system since there will be less variability, he continues. However, it remains to be seen how this will work out in the first few months of Microsoft's new model.

As IT managers begin to roll out these changes, they should keep standard patching best practices in mind, says Sarwate. He recommends deploying updates in waves, so if there's a need to roll back, it's only necessary for a small group of workers.

Ullrich advises corporations to apply patches as soon as Microsoft releases them. Home users should still automatically apply patches.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2016 | 5:51:48 AM
Patch Watching
The worst is downloading and installing a bunch of patches, and then finding out that one has screwed up your system -- and you have to figure out which one.

The sad thing is that "recommended" self-serving vendor patches (as opposed to genuine security updates) have made people distrustful of the entire model -- leading to people not installing important security updates and bad patch-management processes.

Incidentally, Susan Bradley keeps a neat blog on Windows updates -- and what they could do to your systems -- here: windowssecrets.com/category/patch-watch/
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Artist Uses Malware in Installation
Dark Reading Staff 5/17/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12198
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-20
In GoHttp through 2017-07-25, there is a stack-based buffer over-read via a long User-Agent header.
CVE-2019-12185
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-20
eLabFTW 1.8.5 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the /app/controllers/EntityController.php component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use a user account to fully compromise the system using a POST request. This will allow for PHP files to be written to the web r...
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.