Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

8/13/2019
04:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Microsoft Patches Wormable RCE Vulns in Remote Desktop Services

Similar to the now-patched 'BlueKeep' vulnerability, two flaws fixed today could let malware spread across vulnerable computers.

Microsoft today released 93 fixes and two advisories as part of its monthly Patch Tuesday update. Of these, 64 were categorized as Important in severity and 29 were ranked Critical.

Patching priority should be given to two "wormable" remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities that could allow future malware to spread across vulnerable machines without user interaction.

CVE-2019-1181 and CVE-2019-1182 affect Windows 8.1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, and all supported versions of Windows 10, including server versions. They do not affect Windows XP, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008, or the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) itself. Like the BlueKeep RDP vulnerability patched this year, both could let an attacker remotely install and spread malware.

The vulnerabilities exist in Remote Desktop Services, formerly known as Terminal Services, when an unauthenticated attacker connects to a target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests. Because they don't require authentication or user interaction, an attacker could install programs; view, edit, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.

To exploit CVE-2019-1181 and CVE-2019-1182, an attacker would have to use RDP to send a specially crafted request to the target system's RDS. Today's update corrects how Remote Desktop Services handles connection requests. Neither bug has been seen in the wild.

"These vulnerabilities were discovered by Microsoft during hardening of Remote Desktop Services as part of our continual focus on strengthening the security of our products," writes Simon Pope, director of incident response for Microsoft's Security Response Center. "At this time, we have no evidence that these vulnerabilities were known to any third party."

Pope also points to a "partial mitigation" on affected systems with Network Level Authentication (NLA) enabled. Because NLA requires authentication before the flaw can be exploited, these systems are protected from wormable malware, he says. However, they are still vulnerable to RCE if attackers possess valid credentials they can use to authenticate.

Two additional vulnerabilities patched today, CVE-2019-1222 and CVE-2019-1226, are also Critical RCE bugs in RDS but, unlike the previously mentioned bugs, they're not wormable.

Those aside, patches issued today address bugs in Windows, Edge, Internet Explorer, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Office Services and Web Apps, ChakraCore, Azure DevOps Server, Visual Studio, Online Services, and Microsoft Dynamics. None were publicly known or under attack.

Another vulnerability worth noting is CVE-2019-1201, a Critical RCE bug in Microsoft Word resulting from improper handling of objects in memory. An attacker could exploit this by creating a specially crafted Word file and convincing a victim to open it, either by attaching it to an email or hosting it on a malicious website. Outlook's Reading/Preview Pane is an attack vector, meaning victims wouldn't have to open an attachment to be exploited; they could simply view the email. If successful, an attacker could achieve the same permissions a target user has on the system.

It was a big month for patching, especially RCE vulnerabilities: Microsoft also fixed RCE bugs in the Chakra Scripting Engine, Microsoft Graphics, Hyper-V, Outlook, Word, the Windows DHCP client, Scripting Engine, and the VBScript Engine.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
8/14/2019 | 5:12:10 PM
We talked about this before

The vulnerabilities exist in Remote Desktop Services, formerly known as Terminal Services, when an unauthenticated attacker connects to a target system using RDP and sends specially crafted requests.

I think there was a similar article you wrote where we talking about the same issue with RDP (not sure) but it seems the underlying thread is that users who have access to RDP, it is not being authenticated. At somepoint if we don't have controls in place, individuals or nation-states are going to breach that system. I would look at the following items:
  • Add IP address range to only allow internal or external site connections
  • The section of the image where it says "Remote IP Address", select  "These IP Addressess" | "Predefined set of Computers" | Select "LocalSubnet" and if there is a range of external addresses, then add as needed
  • Next go to Start | Run | Type "sysdm.cpl" | Select the Tab "Remote", and make your selection based on security level
  • Image result for rdp require the connection to be encrypted'
  • The last part would be to customize the RDP session to enable authentication and encryption

I think these steps mentioned should address the problem, but it seems we continue to see the same problem.

Oh well, on the journey to enlightenment, we need to be forever vigilant.

Todd

 

 
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
8/15/2019 | 9:55:41 AM
Re: We talked about this before
Port 3389 - also a known problem and I have always disabled that and moved TCP/IP to another available port whenever possible.  
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
8/15/2019 | 12:55:10 PM
Re: We talked about this before

Yes, we do the same thing but we do it at the router or firewall where the port on the outside is 3288 which is redirected to 3389, but we also limit who can access that port as well (ACLs that limit our local offices or we use a jump host with login credentials, but a valid point you made earlier.

Todd
I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
6 Top Nontechnical Degrees for Cybersecurity
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/21/2019
Anatomy of a BEC Scam
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/21/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15593
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
GitLab 12.2.3 contains a security vulnerability that allows a user to affect the availability of the service through a Denial of Service attack in Issue Comments.
CVE-2019-16285
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
If a local user has been configured and logged in, an unauthenticated attacker with physical access may be able to extract sensitive information onto a local drive.
CVE-2019-16286
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
An attacker may be able to bypass the OS application filter meant to restrict applications that can be executed by changing browser preferences to launch a separate process that in turn can execute arbitrary commands.
CVE-2019-16287
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
An attacker may be able to leverage the application filter bypass vulnerability to gain privileged access to create a file on the local file system whose presence puts the device in Administrative Mode, which will allow the attacker to executed commands with elevated privileges.
CVE-2019-18909
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
The VPN software within HP ThinPro does not safely handle user supplied input, which may be leveraged by an attacker to inject commands that will execute with root privileges.