Endpoint

4/15/2016
10:00 AM
Steve Zurier
Steve Zurier
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

How To Prepare For A DDoS Attack: 10 Steps

Like a hurricane or a flood, a DDoS is a crisis. Follow these 10 steps to prepare for an attack before it hits.
Previous
1 of 11
Next

Image Credit: Can Stock Photo

Image Credit: Can Stock Photo

Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are scary. In a matter of minutes, they can shut down a network, service or website, costing companies millions of dollars.

A recent study by Corero Network Security found that while 34 percent of IT managers surveyed cited lost revenues as the most damaging consequence of a DDoS. Nearly half -- or 45 percent -- say loss of customer trust and confidence is their greatest concern.

When they first came on the scene 20 years ago, a DDoS -- which is when a large network of botnets overwhelm another system’s connection causing it to deny service to legitimate traffic – even threatened to take down the Internet itself.

That’s ancient history. Over time, vendors and service providers have developed products that help IT staffs better cope with the threat of a DDoS. But they come in waves and over the past year there has been an uptick in DDoS attacks.

“There have always been various waves of DDoS attacks, and we saw one toward the end of 2015,” says Barry Greene, CTO of Palo Alto-based GetIT, or Green Energy Technology & Infocommunications Technology.

Greene says that although we are currently experiencing a bit of a lull, now’s a good time to prepare for the next wave. He recently authored a white paper on preparing for a DDoS and spent some time talking with Dark Reading about strategies for defending against DDoS attacks. 

“Think of a DDoS as a crisis much like a hurricane or a flood,” Greene says. “You wouldn’t want to start preparing for a hurricane on the day of the event. The same holds true for a DDoS.”

 

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 11
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
MatsS846
100%
0%
MatsS846,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/15/2016 | 4:25:33 PM
11FU
11 pageloads to read one text?

ELEVEN pages?


Yeah...keep it!
LordC623
100%
0%
LordC623,
User Rank: Strategist
4/15/2016 | 10:48:23 AM
No thanks
Oh, interesting story let's check this out.

 

*sees 11 image slide show*

 

*closes browser tab*
Microsoft President: Governments Must Cooperate on Cybersecurity
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/8/2018
To Click or Not to Click: The Answer Is Easy
Kowsik Guruswamy, Chief Technology Officer at Menlo Security,  11/14/2018
Veterans Find New Roles in Enterprise Cybersecurity
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
This report offers insight on how security professionals plan to invest in cybersecurity, and how they are prioritizing their resources. Find out what your peers have planned today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-19279
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-14
PRIMX ZoneCentral before 6.1.2236 on Windows sometimes leaks the plaintext of NTFS files. On non-SSD devices, this is limited to a 5-second window and file sizes less than 600 bytes. The effect on SSD devices may be greater.
CVE-2018-19280
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-14
Centreon 3.4.x has XSS via the resource name or macro expression of a poller macro.
CVE-2018-19281
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-14
Centreon 3.4.x allows SNMP trap SQL Injection.
CVE-2018-17960
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-14
CKEditor 4.x before 4.11.0 allows user-assisted XSS involving a source-mode paste.
CVE-2018-19278
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-14
Buffer overflow in DNS SRV and NAPTR lookups in Digium Asterisk 15.x before 15.6.2 and 16.x before 16.0.1 allows remote attackers to crash Asterisk via a specially crafted DNS SRV or NAPTR response, because a buffer size is supposed to match an expanded length but actually matches a compressed lengt...