Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/26/2017
04:00 PM
50%
50%

HHS Hits CardioNet with $2.5M HIPAA Settlement Fee

The US Department of Health and Human Services slapped the mobile cardiac monitoring service with fee after breach of customer health data.

The US Department of Health and Human Services penalized CardioNet with a $2.5 million settlement fee, after a data breach exposed health data on 3,610 CardioNet clients, according to a resolution agreement reached between the parties this month.

Back in January and February 2012, CardioNet notified HHS of the breaches, the agreement states. The breaches occurred after an unencrypted laptop with clients' "protected health information" was stolen from a vehicle outside of a CardioNet employee's home, according to a report in InfoRisk Today.

An arm of HHS launched a federal investigation, which found indications that CardioNet failed to set security procedures in place to prevent, detect, contain, and correct security violations, as well as conduct risk analysis to determine potential vulnerabilities and risks. The company also appeared to have lacked security policies and procedures to move electronic media and hardware in and out of its facilities, such as ensuring media was encrypted, according to the agreement.

Under the agreement, there is no "admission of liability by CardioNet," and it is "not a concession by HHS that CardioNet is not in violation of the HIPAA Rules and not liable for civil money penalties."

Read more about CardioNet's agreement here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2017 | 9:52:15 AM
$2.5 million
 

Another questions this; how much of these the people whom information stolen are getting?

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2017 | 9:50:36 AM
Settlement Fee
 

So Settlement Fee but no violation? This is a good deal for CardioNet. 
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-31812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-32552
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-16 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32553
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-17 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32554
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the xorg package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.