Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

7/13/2018
02:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

GandCrab Ransomware Continues to Evolve But Can't Spread Via SMB Shares Yet

Recent fears that this year's most prolific ransomware threat has acquired new WannaCry-like propagation capabilities appear unfounded at the moment.

The authors of GandCrab, a ransomware sample that in less than six months has become the biggest threat in its category, are continuing to update and tweak the malware to make it harder to stop. But fears in recent days that they might have added a new WannaCry-like capability for spreading GandCrab via SMB shares appear unfounded at the moment.

Security vendor Fortinet recently discovered a new version (4.1) of GandCrab in the wild. Like its predecessor, released just two days prior to the new discovery, the latest version is being distributed through compromised websites designed to appear like download sites for cracked applications. And as with version 4, version 4.1, like the Petya ransomware tool, also uses the faster Salsa2.0 stream cipher to encrypt data instead of the RSA-2048 encryption used in early GandCrab releases.

The biggest difference in GandCrab 4.1 is that it contains a long, hard-coded list of websites to which the malware connects. Once connected to a URL in the list, the malware sends it data — such as the IP address, username, computer name, network domain, and, if present, a list of anti-malware tools on the system — from the infected system.

Interestingly, according to Fortinet, there is no evidence that any one of the websites in GandCrab 4.1's hard-coded list has actually been compromised. And there's little logical reason why the authors of GandCrab would want to send victim information to so many hosts at once anyway, when all they really need is to have the information sent to one system. The only explanations, according to the security firm, are that the creators of GandCrab are testing the functionality or have put it there as a diversionary tactic.

"Unfortunately, we really don't know what the motivation behind the author truly is and how it makes sense, given that one functional URL can retrieve this information as well," says Val Saengphaibul, senior threat researcher at Fortinet's FortiGuard Labs. "It perhaps might be a smoke screen to throw off analysis or perhaps something experimental that might make sense afterward."

Fortinet's analysis also showed that GandCrab 4.1 is designed to kill numerous processes, such as msftesql.exe, sqlagent.exe, oracle.exe, msaccess.exe, powerpnt.exe, and wordpad.exe, so it can ensure full encryption of any targeted files.

Killing the processes ensures that high-value files of the victim — Microsoft Office Files, Steam, etc. — are encrypted, Saengphaibul says. "Any open, in-progress file is also shut down to allow it to be overwritten to ensure that the full encryption routine takes place on those as well," he says.

One thing that Fortinet's researchers did not find, however, is any evidence that GandCrab is now able to spread via SMB shares, such as WannaCry and Petya/NotPetya. That would have made the threat posed by the malware substantially greater.

According to the vendor, its researchers have not able to find any function in GandCrab 4.1 that would support this capability. Therefore, any fears about exploit propagation via SMB have to be considered as speculative for the moment, the vendor said.

Since first surfacing in January, GandCrab has caught the attention of the security community both for how prolific it has been and for how its authors have managed to keep one step ahead of defenders. As of March, when numbers were last available, the malware had infected over 50,000 systems and netted its operators over $600,000 in ransom payments.

Security researchers have previously noted how the creators of the tool appear to have adopted an agile-like development approach to the malware, including the way it is maintained. From an initially buggy release, the malware has kept evolving, with each version featuring tweaks designed to address shortcomings in previous iterations. Among the several updates is one that surfaced in version 4.0 that gives GandCrab the ability to encrypt data without first connecting to its C2 server, meaning it can encrypt even when an infected system is not connected to the Internet.

Even though many of the updates to the malware have been incremental in nature, they are still enough to warrant continual analysis from the security community, Saengphaibul says. "The GandCrab operation is run in true business-like fashion and focuses on a high return of infection on victims while at the same time focusing on evading antivirus technologies," he notes.

Related Content:

 

 

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
iaa1000
50%
50%
iaa1000,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/22/2018 | 2:53:10 AM
Very first analysis and publication
Hello. The very first analysis and publication about GandCrab-4 Ransomware was made on July 1, 2018.

Link: id-ransomware.blogspot.com
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8003
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A double-free vulnerability in vrend_renderer.c in virglrenderer through 0.8.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service by triggering texture allocation failure, because vrend_renderer_resource_allocated_texture is not an appropriate place for a free.
CVE-2019-20427
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has a buffer overflow and panic, and possibly remote code execution, due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. Interaction between req_capsule_get_size and tgt_brw_write leads to a tgt_shortio2pages integ...
CVE-2019-20428
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has an out-of-bounds read and panic due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. The ldl_request_cancel function mishandles a large lock_count parameter.
CVE-2019-20429
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has an out-of-bounds read and panic (via a modified lm_bufcount field) due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. This is caused by interaction between sptlrpc_svc_unwrap_request and lustre_msg_hdr_size_v2...
CVE-2019-20430
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the mdt module has an LBUG panic (via a large MDT Body eadatasize field) due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client.