Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

5/22/2019
06:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Data Asset Management: What Do You Really Need?

At Interop, a cybersecurity and privacy leader explains her approach to data management and governance at a massive, decentralized company.

INTEROP 2019 – LAS VEGAS – Nobody wants to admit they don't know what kind of data they're collecting, where it goes, or where their backups are located. In a room packed with IT professionals, one could guess at least a few are grappling with those exact questions.

"It's really critical to us to know what we have," said Stacey Halota, vice president of information security and privacy at Graham Holdings Co., during a keynote chat with Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters at Interop 2019, held this week in Las Vegas. Each year, Graham Holdings conducts a "sensitive data project" to inventory data from every organization in the company. When the iterative process is complete, she explained, all of the metrics are sent to the board.

Much of the chat focused on data asset management and governance, a hot topic among the IT pro audience. Each data privacy regulation forces IT and security teams to consider data in a different way, Halota said. Consider GDPR, which she said was "a little bit easier" for the global company because it was already regulated by the European Union's Data Protection Directive.

"GDPR is a supercharged version of the directive," Halota noted. But the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which has a different definition for personally identifiable information (PII), required a broader approach. Graham Holdings had to consider a wider range of device information to ensure its definition of PII was varied enough to include all of the data it stores. Its data protection impact assessment (DIPA) and existing risk assessments had to be repackaged.

New regulations have prompted technological change. The company relies on Archer for much of its data governance and risk compliance. A major step for GDPR, CCPA, and the many bills coming in the future is to repurpose Archer in some ways to define risk assessment and expand its document repository so it collects data needed for different laws.

Halota isn't only concerned with ensuring compliance for Graham Holdings' data. She's also focused on reducing the collection of sensitive data and deleting anything it doesn't need.

"To us, the keystone of our business is information," she said. "It's understanding what you have and what you collect ... what you collect is precious, it's important, and it's important to only collect what we need." If a company doesn't need information, it should delete it. As part of the sensitive data project, Graham Holdings' organizations are not only asked about the information they collected, but that which they deleted. If they didn't delete anything, why?

"We seek to minimize the really sensitive data that we hold," Halota said. For instance, Graham Holdings keeps data in production environments but scrambles it in non-production. It doesn't keep credit card numbers if it can help it, she added; if it has numbers, they're tokenized.

Keeping sensitive data to a minimum is a businesswide effort. Halota has to speak with everyone – CEO, CFO, marketing, human resources, legal – to understand their needs and when it may be time to eliminate data. "It's always a hard conversation," she said, and it can be complicated. "I've had missteps myself ... I think things should be deleted and they don't."

The most important part is building a relationship with different departments. "It's absolutely critical" to talk with every part of the business so she can argue when data isn't valuable to the company. "It's not just saying, 'We're going to delete all this stuff,'" she said.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19645
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
alter.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger infinite recursion via certain types of self-referential views in conjunction with ALTER TABLE statements.
CVE-2019-19678
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the generic field entry point via the Generic Test Definition field of a new Generic Test issue.
CVE-2019-19679
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the Pre-Condition Summary entry point via the summary field of a Create Pre-Condition action for a new Test Issue.
CVE-2019-19647
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
radare2 through 4.0.0 lacks validation of the content variable in the function r_asm_pseudo_incbin at libr/asm/asm.c, ultimately leading to an arbitrary write. This allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted input.
CVE-2019-19648
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution.