Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

1/17/2017
02:30 PM
Travis Rosiek
Travis Rosiek
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Close The Gap Between IT & Security To Reduce The Impact Of Cyber Threats

IT and security teams work more effectively together than apart.

Every modern organization operating today needs to rely on IT teams for service assurance within their networks and security professionals to keep everything safe. Organizations need both to operate effectively, not unlike a person employing both halves of the brain. However, because of the way IT and security have developed in siloed environments over the years, a gap has formed between them that decreases the effectiveness of both.

It's probably no surprise to anyone working in technology why this gap has formed between these two teams. For years, the primary focus of most organizations was IT. The IT team had to get websites, applications, and communication systems up and running. Then came a wave of cyberattacks, and a security team got added — some might say bolted on — as a separate entity with its own responsibilities.

Even though both groups have the best interests of the host organization at heart, the gap still formed because they use different lexicons and tools, and have different priorities within network operations. In some cases, they may not be physically based in the same location or, in the case of outsourcing, be managed by the same company. That puts a lot of roadblocks in the way of collaboration, with the costs associated with effective systems integration being one of the leading factors impeding executives' decision making. But leaders need to ask the question: Do I invest in securing my business effectively in a manner that allows systems to function to the full extent of their capabilities, or do I suffer the costs of being compromised?

Hackers have already taken notice and are using this gap to their advantage. The use of advanced tools, such as Hammertoss, is a perfect example. It was designed to mimic normal user behavior, thus hiding from cybersecurity teams that didn't have enough visibility into network operations to spot the anomalies. And it exfiltrated data so slowly, using such little bandwidth, that IT teams didn't detect anything amiss on their end. Had IT and security teams been working together on a unified platform with shared situational awareness, there likely would have been more than enough clues to unmask the threat before it could cause significant damage.

There are many advantages to having separate IT and security teams, with the most important being that it allows experts in both groups to hone specific skill sets that make them more effective at their jobs. But that doesn't mean that each must operate within a silo. Combining security and IT operations can be as simple as encouraging more communications and providing tools that give them visibility into areas supervised by the other group.

In security, having a deeper understanding of how systems within the network are designed to perform would help them to better spot and stop threats. Modern advanced persistent threats that use tools like Hammertoss, which have been successful at exploiting the gap, would have a much harder time. Attacks that leverage native capabilities in the operating system or whitelisted websites/applications (such as tech support) would not be so invisible to those on the security team if they knew what day-to-day operations of those systems looked like from an IT perspective.

IT would also benefit from better collaboration with security. One advantage would be allowing IT teams to think more like analysts when planning network expansions. Generally, IT staffers working in a silo consider having more systems and more capacity to be a good thing, even though recent studies have found that as much as 40% of the capacity of most networks is not utilized. From a security perspective, more capacity and more systems equals a bigger complexity, which adversaries can use to their advantage. Combining those methodologies could lead to more efficient and less expensive network growth.

I have seen firsthand the advantages when IT and security become more integrated. During my time working in government, I used to manage a branch that performed root cause analysis and analyze metrics for cyber defense across agencies. We worked with assessment teams as well as incident response with focus on identifying gaps across people, process, technology, and policy. What I always observed was that organizations that had their IT and security teams tightly integrated to foster collaboration had much greater success during our assessments.

Ideally, security and IT should collaborate from the design phase of every new project. That can act as a good starting point in bringing those two worlds together and teaching them how to work together. Once the advantages of doing that are observed by both groups, it will be much easier to get buy-in on the bigger goal of complete integration and collaboration. Only then will the gap finally start to close, eliminating a core danger to networks while also improving overall efficiency and cost savings.

Related Content:

With nearly 20 years of experience in the security industry, Travis is a highly accomplished cyber defense leader having led several commercial and U.S. government programs. He is known for developing and executing strategic plans to build the technical capacity ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...