Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

8/7/2014
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Attack Harbors Malware In Images

'Lurk' click-fraud campaign now employing steganography.

BLACK HAT USA -- Las Vegas -- Steganography long has been a tool in the intelligence community and most recently terror groups, but a cyber crime gang has been spotted using the stealth technique of embedding information or code inside digital images.

A researcher at Dell SecureWorks investigating an attack in an incident response engagement at a customer site discovered that the malware involved--Lurk--had been spread via a phony digital image as part of a click-fraud campaign. Steganography typically is used in targeted attack scenarios, so the use of the method of hiding and slipping malware onto machines for click-fraud purposes is rare, says Brett Stone-Gross, a researcher with Dell SecureWorks' Counter Threat Unit.

The attackers have infected some 350,000 victims in less than a year's time, amassing a quarter of a million dollars in profit in just a few months, according to Dell SecureWorks.

Most intrusion detection and intrusion prevention products can't detect malware hidden with steganography, so the stealth method of spreading malicious code within an image is tough to catch, according to Stone-Gross. "This is something that's not very complex, but difficult to detect," he says.

Lurk was reported earlier this year by researcher Kafeine, which found the downloader malware spreading via iFrames on websites via an Adobe Flash exploit. Among the websites compromised in that campaign were eHow and Livestrong.

The attack requires the victim have a vulnerable version of Adobe Flash, triggering the exploit which then downloads Lurk. In the case of the steganography payload, the malware is downloaded as a plain white image, which contains an encrypted URL that downloads a second payload.

Researchers at Symantec three years ago spotted the cyber espionage gang behind Operation Shady RAT using steganography to hid commands controlling infected machines. Images of a pastoral waterside scene to a suggestive photo of a woman in a hat were used to mask commands ordering the infected machines to phone home to the command-and-control (C&C) server.

"In general, steganography is becoming a much more popular trend," Stone-Gross says. The KINS variant of Zeus, for instance, uses non-digital steganography file to append a configuration file or command to an image file, he says.

Digital steganography, which was used in the Lurk click-fraud campaign, is more difficult to detect. The attack campaign remains active.

Defending against steganography-borne malware is more about prevention: "Make sure you don't get infected in the first place. Basic techniques--make sure your software is updated," Stone-Gross says. The method of hiding and spreading malware will grow, he says.

A full technical analysis of the attack is here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15734
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
An Origin Validation Error vulnerability in Bitdefender Safepay allows an attacker to manipulate the browser's file upload capability into accessing other files in the same directory or sub-directories. This issue affects: Bitdefender Safepay versions prior to 25.0.7.29.
CVE-2020-7924
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
Usage of specific command line parameter in MongoDB Tools which was originally intended to just skip hostname checks, may result in MongoDB skipping all certificate validation. This may result in accepting invalid certificates.This issue affects: MongoDB Inc. MongoDB Database Tools 3.6 versions late...
CVE-2021-27486
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
The Fatek Automation WinProladder Versions 3.3 and prior are vulnerable to an integer underflow, which may cause an out-of-bounds write and allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2021-3465
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-15942
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
An information disclosure vulnerability in Web Vulnerability Scan profile of Fortinet's FortiWeb version 6.2.x below 6.2.4 and version 6.3.x below 6.3.5 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to read the password used by the FortiWeb scanner to access the device defined in the scan profile.