Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

2/11/2016
09:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

5 Reveals About Today's Attack M.O.s From Skype Spying Malware

T9000 backdoor is built with many of today's cybercriminal tricks up its sleeves.

A new piece of malware making the rounds intercepts Skype communications and takes custom backdoor software a step forward, according the researchers with Palo Alto Networks, who discovered it. Dubbed T9000, the malware contains a host of cybercriminal bells and whistles.

"Most custom backdoors used by advanced attackers have limited functionality. They evade detection by keeping their code simple and flying under the radar. But during a recent investigation we found a backdoor that takes a very different approach," say researchers Josh Grunzweig and Jen Miller-Osborn. "In addition to the basic functionality all backdoors provide, T9000 allows the attacker to capture encrypted data, take screenshots of specific applications, and specifically target Skype users."

The backdoor may be remarkable in all of the added functionality and evasion techniques packed into it, but each flourish is pretty typical of today's attacker modus operandi. For example:  

Reveal 1: Evolved From Another Piece Of Malware

Like many pieces of malware today, T9000 is evolved from a previous incarnation, T5000 (AKA Plat1, which was first discovered by Cylance back in 2013. Security researchers have found time and again that the majority of malware is based on recycled code.

Reveal 2: Used In Targeted Attacks To Collect Intel On Targets

Grunzweig and Miller-Osborn report that T9000 has been used in a number of targeted attacks against U.S. organizations. The main purpose of this malware is to gather some serious dirt on the victims.

"In fact, the author chose to store critical files dropped by the Trojan in a directory named 'Intel,'" the wrote. "T9000 is pre-configured to automatically capture data about the infected system and steal files of specific types stored on removable media."

This includes taking screencaps from Skype video calls, recording calls in their entirety, tracking chat messages and collect tons of other files across the entire system.

Reveal 3: Distributed By Spearphishing With A Malicious RTF File

T9000 appears to be delivered via spearphishing using a malicious RTF to set the chain of infection in motion. The document is crafted using exploits against a nearly four-year-old ActiveX vulnerability in Microsoft Office and a year-old Microsoft Office memory corruption vulnerability. According to Sean Wilson with PhishMe, the firm has recently seen an increase of malware samples like T9000 taking advantage of RTF temp files as a way to encapsulate and drop malware.

Reveal 4: Anti-malware Evasion

"The malware goes to great lengths to identify a total of 24 potential security products that may be running on a system and customizes its installation mechanism to specifically evade those that are installed," Grunzweig and Jen Miller-Osborn wrote.

Attackers are increasingly jumping through hoops to add evasive tactics like these to their malware. In a presentation for RSA Conference 2015, Dr. Christopher Kruegel with Lastline reported that evasive techniques used by malware doubled last year.

Reveal 5: Multi-stage Installation

T9000 engages in a mult-stage installation process that starts with that check for the aforementioned security products and customizes the files it drops according to that and a number of system-state variables.

Multi-stage attacks have become the preferred method of getting malware fully installed on systems, giving attackers maximum flexibility in evasion techniques.

More on this topic: 

Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about information security at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Register today and receive an early bird discount of $200.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15943
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
vphysics.dll in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive before 1.37.1.1 allows remote attackers to achieve code execution or denial of service by creating a gaming server and inviting a victim to this server, because a crafted map is mishandled during a memset call.
CVE-2019-16413
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-19
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.0.4. The 9p filesystem did not protect i_size_write() properly, which causes an i_size_read() infinite loop and denial of service on SMP systems.
CVE-2019-3738
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2019-3739
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3740
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.