Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

4/7/2015
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

3 Internet Of Things Devices That Threaten More Than Your Data

Veracode study of IoT devices show how vulnerabilities in our always-on households can have dire real-world consequences.

As more households take advantage of the benefits that non-traditional Internet-connected devices can provide in convenience, cost savings, and entertainment, the additional risks should also be considered when plugging into the Internet of Things (IoT). A new study out today by researchers with Veracode offers insight into such risks by taking a look at six popular IoT consumer devices and showing how vulnerabilities in these devices could potentially leave users open to burglary, eavesdropping, and stalking.  

“It’s hard to not be excited about what the IoT has enabled and will bring in the future, although that doesn’t mean cybersecurity should be sacrificed in the process,” said Brandon Creighton, Veracode security research architect. “We need to look at the IoT holistically to ensure that the devices, as well as their web and mobile applications and back-end cloud services, are built securely from their inception. Security should not be treated as an afterthought or add-on, or we risk putting our personal information in jeopardy or even opening the door to physical harm.”

All the devices picked by Veracode for examination had three common characteristics. They are all marketed to end users who don't need special technical expertise to use them, they're all always on and connected to the Internet permanently, and they all significantly interact with the physical environment in some way or another through built-in sensors or communication with important household devices. Each of the devices were subjected to a uniform battery of tests that included checks on authentication, encryption, and protocol security. Some of the issues found were open debugging interfaces that could allow remote arbitrary code execution, protocol weaknesses that would allow attackers to access sensitive data from the device and lack of enforcement of strong passwords. In particular, the following three devices provide the opportunity for some scary attack scenarios.

 

MyQ Garage

This Internet-based remote control for control of garage doors does not enforce strong passwords, has an unprotected debugging environment, doesn't secure sensitive data sent between the device and mobile applications, and is potentially open to man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attacks. According to researchers, attackers might steal data about when the door is opened and closed -- in order to plan the best time for break-ins -- or even obtain the capability to remotely open the door to gain access once the owner is gone.

 

Ubi

Ubi -- an always-on device designed to answer questions, connect to home automation devices, and perform tasks like sending texts or turning on music on devices -- doesn't protect against MiTM, has weaknesses in encryption at rest and in motion, and is vulnerable to replay attacks. Veracode says that a compromise of an Ubi account would give attackers the ability to steal contact list information held by the user or spy on their Google calendar for stalking or corporate spying. Similar to the MyQ, a compromise would give an attacker historical information on the user's home about temperature, humidity, air pressure, ambient light, and sound levels that could be used to build a profile for future break-ins.

 

Wink Relay

A combination hub and control device for home automation sensors and products, Wink Relay has a number of flaws, most critical of which is the ability for remote arbitrary code execution. This means that potential attackers could not only collect information about the user's activity but also control the device remotely. For example, an attacker could turn on the microphone on the device to listen in and record private conversations, giving them the ability to blackmail users or collect information for corporate espionage.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RaiderRoss
100%
0%
RaiderRoss,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/7/2015 | 5:03:24 PM
Need for a centralized DB
I am personally an adopter of many things in the 'connected home'. However, I do not allow connections out to the Internet for the very reason that these devices often think of security as something that happens somewhere else in the network - if at all.

That being said, I'd love to see these manufacturers all get together and publish a centralized database or forum where the pitfalls can be discussed and corrected. It is in EVERYONE'S best interest to get the information out there and the proper protections in place.

 
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
4/7/2015 | 4:24:37 PM
IoT breach cases?
Are there any documented cases of people's IoT devices being hacked that resulted in any serious consequences (physical harm, harassment, or theft but not the exposure of personal information)?
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Breaches Are Inevitable, So Embrace the Chaos
Ariel Zeitlin, Chief Technology Officer & Co-Founder, Guardicore,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.
CVE-2019-16761
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A specially crafted Bitcoin script can cause a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result of the [email protected] npm package. An attacker could create a specially crafted Bitcoin script in order to cause a hard-fork from the SLP consensus. All versions >1.0...
CVE-2019-16762
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A specially crafted Bitcoin script can cause a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result of the slpjs npm package. An attacker could create a specially crafted Bitcoin script in order to cause a hard-fork from the SLP consensus. Affected users can upgrade to any...
CVE-2019-13581
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A heap-based buffer overflow allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary ...
CVE-2019-13582
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A stack overflow could lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.