Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security //

VPN

// // //
9/6/2018
08:05 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

Attackers Snoop on MikroTik Router Traffic

Researchers at Qihoo 360 Netlab report that unknown attackers have eavesdropped on the traffic of thousands of MikroTik routers.

Over 7,400 MikroTik routers have had their traffic eavesdropped on by unknown attackers, according to security researchers at Qihoo 360 Netlab.

They say that they found the most affected routers in Russia (1,628), followed by Iran (637), Brazil (615), India (594) and Ukraine (544). The researchers also say that they have seen a "massive number of victims having their Socks4 proxy enabled on the device by one single malicious actor."

The attackers are using Winbox Any Directory File Read (CVE-2018-14847) and Webfig Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, even though CVE-2018-14847 has been patched since April. Both are part of the Vault7-originated hacking tool Chimay Red.

This has allowed the MikroTik TZSP (TaZmen Sniffer Protocol) traffic to be forwarded to nine external IP addresses.

The researchers found that the attackers focused on ports 20, 21, 25, 110 and 144 (which are involved in FTP-data) FTP, SMTP, POP3 and IMAP traffic. They also seem interested in SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) ports 161 and 162.

However, the attacker seems to have made some rookie mistakes. First, the HTTP proxy forwards requests to a local HTTP 403 error page, and in this error page a link for web-mining code from coinhive.com is inserted. This would indicate they are looking to conduct cryptocurrency mining on all the proxy traffic of the routers.

Couleur via Pixabay
Couleur via Pixabay

But all the external web resources, including those from coinhive.com necessary for web mining, are blocked by the proxy ACLs, which have been set by the attackers themselves. Whether this was an intentional move or the result of error is unclear.

Additionally, for the attacker to gain control, even after device reboot (which means an IP change), the infected device runs a scheduled task to periodically report its latest IP address by accessing a specific attacker's URL. This gives the attacker the relevant information needed to identify their victims once again.

The attacker will also scan for more MikroTik devices to infect by using these compromised Socks4 proxies, so the persistence has a purpose beyond just extending itself.

The researchers say that they are not comfortable in sharing the IPs involved in this problem with the public, but "relevant security entities in affected countries" are welcome to contact them for the full IP list from their findings.

But the researchers did say that "37.1.207.114 is the top player among all the attackers."

The researchers recommend that MikroTik RouterOS users update the software system and check whether the http proxy, Socks4 proxy and network-traffic-capture function are being maliciously exploited.

They also recommend that MikroTik deny inbound access to the Webfig and Winbox ports from the Internet and improve the software-security-update mechanism.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-1678
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
An issue was discovered in the Linux Kernel from 4.18 to 4.19, an improper update of sock reference in TCP pacing can lead to memory/netns leak, which can be used by remote clients.
CVE-2021-32966
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
Philips Interoperability Solution XDS versions 2.5 through 3.11 and 2018-1 through 2021-1 are vulnerable to clear text transmission of sensitive information when configured to use LDAP via TLS and where the domain controller returns LDAP referrals, which may allow an attacker to remotely read LDAP s...
CVE-2021-32989
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
When a non-existent resource is requested, the LCDS LAquis SCADA application (version 4.3.1.1011 and prior) returns error messages which may allow reflected cross-site scripting.
CVE-2021-32997
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
The affected Baker Hughes Bentley Nevada products (3500 System 1 6.x, Part No. 3060/00 versions 6.98 and prior, 3500 System 1, Part No. 3071/xx & 3072/xx versions 21.1 HF1 and prior, 3500 Rack Configuration, Part No. 129133-01 versions 6.4 and prior, and 3500/22M Firmware, Part No. 288055-01 ver...
CVE-2021-35487
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-25
Nokia Broadcast Message Center through 11.1.0 allows an authenticated user to perform a Boolean Blind SQL Injection attack on the endpoint /owui/block/send-receive-updates (for the Manage Alerts page) via the extIdentifier HTTP POST parameter. This allows an attacker to obtain the database user, dat...