Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security

// // //

Three Reasons Facial Recognition Will Win

Facial recognition technology is coming to a device near you. Here are three reasons it's inevitable.

ORLANDO -- Microsoft Ignite 2017 -- On September 12, Apple introduced the iPhone X with a host of new features including facial recognition as a biometric authentication technology. The Internet pretty much lost its collective mind. Facial recognition was a sign of the end of days, the end of privacy or the coming of our alien overlords, depending on who you listened to.

This week at Microsoft Ignite, I had a chance to sit down with Samsung, which, as it turns out, has several smartphones of its own. The Galaxy 8 comes with facial recognition as one of its authentication methods, along with iris scanning and fingerprint recognition. Imagine that.

Now, when the Galaxy 8 came out, there were articles that pointed out the flaws in the facial recognition technology, but the terms used weren't apocolyptic. They were, in fact, closer in tone to the articles pointing out the deficiencies in Apple's fingerprint technology when it was introduced -- you know, the fingerprint technology that approximately every iPhone user now considers a convenient security method.

At Ignite, I had a chance to talk with a number of security companies, and in doing so I became convinced that facial recognition (perhaps with iris scanning as a component of the whole) is going to become a common part of our security landscape. There are three things that convince me that this is true.

Facial recognition is convenient
People don't like typing PINs into a mobile device. They like passwords even less. What they really want is a system that just recognizes them and authenticates them into the device when they pick it up -- and facial recognition comes very close to doing just that.

Security is always a balancing act between convenience (a user-focused synonym for usability) and safety. For most users, it doesn't take a lot to make the equation balance out with far less security than ideal if the convenience score goes down. In the same way that executives drove acceptance of iPads and iPhones in the enterprise, they will drive acceptance of facial recognition even if there are issues with the technology.Facial recognition is easy
Apple has managed to do exactly the right thing to promote use of facial recognition within apps: If the app can use the fingerprint scanner for authentication, then facial recognition will just work. It works automatically, with absolutely no additional code required from the app developer.

I spoke with a couple of developers at Ignite who told me that they were surprised and pleased with the new capability that came courtesy of the iOS and hardware upgrade. As it turns out, it's far more effort to not implement facial recognition after fingerprint recognition is turned on than to accept the method. This guarantees that, as phones with the capability spread, use of the capability will spread right along with them.


Want to learn more about the tech and business cases for deploying virtualized solutions in the cable network? Join us in Denver on October 18 for Light Reading's Virtualizing the Cable Architecture event – a free breakfast panel at SCTE/ISBE's Cable-Tec Expo featuring speakers from Comcast and Charter.

Facial recognition is "secure enough"
Will the facial recognition available on the iPhone be acceptable as an authentication method for classified information? Probably not. But most people and organizations don't need that level of security. They need something that is approximately as secure as a moderately strong password with a high enough convenience factor to convince people to actually use the security. And facial recognition qualifies on both scores.

Both Apple and Samsung have done significant work to make facial recognition an acceptable option for authenticating a user to their mobile device. The technology will spread from smartphones to other devices. Get used to looking at your system in order to unlock its functions -- facial recognition as a biometric system is coming to a system near you.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The 10 Most Impactful Types of Vulnerabilities for Enterprises Today
Managing system vulnerabilities is one of the old est - and most frustrating - security challenges that enterprise defenders face. Every software application and hardware device ships with intrinsic flaws - flaws that, if critical enough, attackers can exploit from anywhere in the world. It's crucial that defenders take stock of what areas of the tech stack have the most emerging, and critical, vulnerabilities they must manage. It's not just zero day vulnerabilities. Consider that CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog lists vulnerabilitlies in widely used applications that are "actively exploited," and most of them are flaws that were discovered several years ago and have been fixed. There are also emerging vulnerabilities in 5G networks, cloud infrastructure, Edge applications, and firmwares to consider.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-1142
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use URL decoding to retrieve system files, credentials, and bypass authentication resulting in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1143
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use Lua scripts, which could allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2023-1144
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 contains an improper access control vulnerability in which an attacker can use the Device-Gateway service and bypass authorization, which could result in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1145
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 are affected by a deserialization vulnerability targeting the Device-DataCollect service, which could allow deserialization of requests prior to authentication, resulting in remote code execution.
CVE-2023-1655
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to 2.4.0.