Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security

10:20 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

The Face of Enterprise Security

Facial recognition is starting to grow as a technology on consumer devices; what does that mean for your enterprise security?

It's the time of year when Apple pops out a new iPhone to extract any money that may be lying around a consumer's wallet. The newest one (do we call it iPhone "Ecks" or "ten" or what?) has some interesting technology in it called FaceID.

As we know now, it's a biometric system, similar to the fingerprint-using TouchID, that can recognize a user's face and authenticate them. When Touch ID first appeared, many were concerned that the biometric data of a user would be spread around the Apple ecosystem. It took some major explaining by Apple of how things worked -- the actual data never left the phone and third parties only saw a yes/no that the phone generated -- to calm those fears down.

There has been no similar uprising about the FaceID technology, since Apple has been assumed to be doing the same thing as it did with Touch ID to preserve user anonymity. They even explicitly said that to privacy advocates in September. That may be true on a technical basis, but some interesting things are now coming out on how Apple will share FaceID with developers.

Reuters has reported that, based on a contract they had seen, developers will be able to get facial information from the new iPhone. While the developers have to agree to seek customer permission for this as well as agree not to sell the data to a third party, the resultant data may end up on the developer's servers.

Apple thinks it can enforce this approach by threatening to pull any non-compliant apps from its App Store, and pre-screen apps before allowing them on the store. Privacy advocates are not so convinced of Apple's ability to police this. There are only spot checks of source code performed by Apple, and they have never pulled an app from the Store because of poor information-sharing practices.

Even if an app was pulled, might a developer think that they could end up making more after the pull by selling the now unencumbered facial data that they have to some marketer?

If an employee is willing to share facial data (expressions for example) with some app, should the employer be concerned? It must depend on the context of that use.

Using FaceID to make a character in a game smile won't directly affect an employee's job performance. But twitching their cheek to effect spreadsheet cell selection might.

Apple is no doubt trying to make FaceID desirable to consumers by allowing developers to use it for their apps. However, this illustrates how the best intentions can go awry. An organization is faced with a different kind of shadow IT going on here. They and the user rely on one company to enforce the app-only, no-marketing doctrine without assurances that it will be effective. Besides unlocking a phone, the technology allows for a user's face to be continually monitored. Most users -- and their employers -- may not even considered that as a possibility. It's already here.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
How Data Breaches Affect the Enterprise
Data breaches continue to cause negative outcomes for companies worldwide. However, many organizations report that major impacts have declined significantly compared with a year ago, suggesting that many have gotten better at containing breach fallout. Download Dark Reading's Report "How Data Breaches Affect the Enterprise" to delve more into this timely topic.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-11-27
janus-gateway is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
PUBLISHED: 2021-11-26
This affects all versions of package html-to-csv. When there is a formula embedded in a HTML page, it gets accepted without any validation and the same would be pushed while converting it into a CSV file. Through this a malicious actor can embed or generate a malicious link or execute commands via C...
PUBLISHED: 2021-11-26
@joeattardi/emoji-button is a Vanilla JavaScript emoji picker component. In affected versions there are two vectors for XSS attacks: a URL for a custom emoji, and an i18n string. In both of these cases, a value can be crafted such that it can insert a `script` tag into the page and execute malicious...
PUBLISHED: 2021-11-26
Backstage is an open platform for building developer portals. In affected versions the auth-backend plugin allows a malicious actor to trick another user into visiting a vulnerable URL that executes an XSS attack. This attack can potentially allow the attacker to exfiltrate access tokens or other se...
PUBLISHED: 2021-11-26
There is a Potential Zip Slip Vulnerability and OS Command Injection Vulnerability on the management system of baserCMS. Users with permissions to upload files may upload crafted zip files which may execute arbitrary commands on the host operating system. This is a vulnerability that needs to be add...