Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security

// // //
1/28/2019
09:15 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

'Steganography' Obsfucation Hides Old PDF Exploits From Antivirus Tools

EdgeSpot has found two new obsfucation methods to hide old PDF exploits from various antivirus tools.

Security firm EdgeSpot has been looking for PDF file exploits lately. Now, the firm's researchers have found two interesting ones.

The first is one that uses the PDF JS API this.getPageNumWords() and this.getPageNthWord() to "read" the Javascript contents on the PDF page. It executes the Javascript via eval(box).

This exploit is very similar to CVE-2013-3346, which was not obfuscated at that time of first discovery. Because of the obsfucation, it will bypass antivirus detection.

The obsfucation method that EdgeSpot researchers found could be used to hide other exploits besides this one.

After finding the first one, a second method of obsfucation was found a week later -- and it is potentially much more powerful.

(Source: iStock)
(Source: iStock)

It hides inside images in PDF files. This "steganography" method seems to be designed to once again hide from detection by AV engines. Specifically, researchers found that two layers of obfuscation were used in this exploit. The first layer is what they have previously discussed -- the method of "this.getPageNumWords()" and "this.getPageNthWord()". The exploit uses "this.getPageNumWords()" and "this.getPageNthWord()" to read and execute the Javascript hidden as “content."

The second layer is new and contains "Javascript content."

The API references say that these two APIs, working together, are used to read the stream of an image named "icon" which stored in the PDF file.

Looking at their sample’s Javascript code, researchers figured out that the code's function is to read and decode the "message" hidden in the icon's stream. Once it read the "message" successfully, it executes the "message" as Javascript code, via “eval(msg)”.

The icon stream, which is simply named "icon," could be saved as a "jpg" file and viewed in image viewer without problem.

This led the researchers to conclude that the attacker likely copied a project/technique called "steganography.js", which is open sourced. The project was developed working on browsers.

EdgeSpot researchers also believe the person or persons behind the PDF samples made their innovation as they successfully leveraged the technique in PDF format. They could not find any information mentioning this technique in PDF exploits previously, so they think this is the first time that the "steganography" technique has been used to hide PDF exploits.

By using this technique, all streams look normal, all images are viewable, and everything looks legitimate. This can probably explain why almost all AV engines missed it.

Old exploits can be dressed up to hide themselves from detection. Security teams have to be aware that such mutation may occur, and adjust their own techniques accordingly.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Improving Enterprise Cybersecurity With XDR
Enterprises are looking at eXtended Detection and Response technologies to improve their abilities to detect, and respond to, threats. While endpoint detection and response is not new to enterprise security, organizations have to improve network visibility, expand data collection and expand threat hunting capabilites if they want their XDR deployments to succeed. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: a market overview for XDR from Omdia, questions to ask before deploying XDR, and an XDR primer.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-2306
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-05
Old session tokens can be used to authenticate to the application and send authenticated requests.
CVE-2022-34918
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.18.9. A type confusion bug in nft_set_elem_init (leading to a buffer overflow) could be used by a local attacker to escalate privileges, a different vulnerability than CVE-2022-32250. (The attacker can obtain root access, but must start with an u...
CVE-2022-34829
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus before 6203 allows a denial of service (application restart) via a crafted payload to the Mobile App Deployment API.
CVE-2022-31600
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the SmmCore, where a user with high privileges can chain another vulnerability to this vulnerability, causing an integer overflow, possibly leading to code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, compromised integrity, and informat...
CVE-2022-31601
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
NVIDIA DGX A100 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS in the SmbiosPei, which may allow a highly privileged local attacker to cause an out-of-bounds write, which may lead to code execution, denial of service, compromised integrity, and information disclosure.