Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security

12/20/2018
08:15 AM
Alan
 Zeichick
Alan Zeichick
Alan Zeichick
50%
50%

Email Spam: Don't Be a Chump or a Jerk

For decades, spam emails have clogged up corporate email inboxes. However, there are some simple rules and guidelines IT pros, as well as marketers, can use to cut down on this, and make everyone more secure.

Should you unsubscribe from unwanted email marketing? If you decide to unsubscribe, is it safe to click on an unsubscribe link, or to reply with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line, if that's what the sender requests?

It all depends on the nature of the email.

My long-time advice to individuals and businesses has always been to unsubscribe only if -- and only if -- that unwanted mail appears to be legitimate, like from a known vendor's promotion list. Otherwise, I urge you to do nothing that verifies to the emailer that they've reached a live mailbox, and that means you should delete the email.

In addition, you should configure your email application to refuse to load any images automatically. One-pixel images, after all, are the most common way of showing which emails are opened, and spammers use that technique, whether it's cold-call marketing message from real-world vendors to rip-off con messages from Nigerian princes. (See Spam at 40: Still a Robust Security Threat in Middle Age.)

So, if you don't know the sender or if the email looks suspicious: Delete, Delete, Delete.

But what about unsubscribing from legitimate email marketing? It's probably safe, but it may not be effective, according to the Internet Society's Online Trust Alliance. The OTA has published its fifth annual email marketing and unsubscribe audit report, and the results aren't pretty -- even if things are better than several years ago.

The big question that the OTA wanted to find out in this audit was, do online retailers actually honor unsubscribe requests, and respect those requests moving forward?

To make this determination, the organization studied 200 North American online retailers, noting:

For each site, analysts measured and tracked the signup process and user experience, and after observing emails received for as much as six months (and no less than one month), each account was unsubscribed, and activity and compliance was monitored for a period of at least thirty days.

Let's jump right to the bottom line: 89% of senders stopped sending messages immediately -- up from 88% in 2017 and 86% in 2016. That's good progress.

What's also promising is that only three of the marketers continued sending email ten days after the subscriber hit the "unsubscribe" link -- down from eight in 2017 and 11 in 2016. Let's celebrate that improvement.

Advice for email or IT admins
Are there other techniques to reduce spam that you receive, or which is received by your employees at their business email address?

Yes -- your corporate email server should include top-shelf spam filters, and make sure that all that functionality is enabled. Pay extra attention to features that can detect -- and block or sandbox -- ransomware and spearphishing.

If you can't find those types of features, you may want to subscribe to a third-party email filtering service that intercepts spam and malware before it hits your own email server.

To fight spearphishing at the minimum, your email system should reject email that appears to be "from" your own domain that didn't originate with an authenticated SMTP connection to your own email server.

Advice for email marketers
Your organization may send email marketing to existing customers or to prospective customers. There's nothing wrong with that… but there are best practices for ensuring a quality customer engagement, and also for complying with applicable laws -- such as CAN-SPAMin the US.

On the regulatory side, check the laws. In the US, the relevant body is the Federal Trade Commission, which has a lot of important rules that truly aren't difficult to follow -- but it's easy for eager, untrained marketers, or dishonest marketers, to avoid them. In short, those rules cover:

  • Don't use false or misleading header information
  • Don't use deceptive subject lines
  • Identify the message as an ad
  • Tell recipients where you are located
  • Tell recipients how to opt out of receiving future email from you
  • Honor opt-out requests promptly
  • Monitor what others are doing on your behalf

In addition to those common-sense CAN-SPAM rules, there are several suggestions from groups, including OTA, which show how to make customers happy with their email experience -- even if they want to unsubscribe. Check out the audit report and ask how your practices compare to the OTA's audit results.

Overall advice
Let's tie all this up with a bow:

  • If you receive spam, it's safest to delete it unless you truly know and trust the sender -- don't be a chump.
  • If you administer business email systems, make sure your corporate email server has strong anti-spam functionality.
  • And if you send marketing emails for your company, follow the rules and don't be a jerk.

It's as simple as that.

Related posts:

Alan Zeichick is principal analyst at Camden Associates, a technology consultancy in Phoenix, Arizona, specializing in enterprise networking, cybersecurity, and software development. Follow him @zeichick.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-4719
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
The client API authentication mechanism in Pexip Infinity before 10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted request.
CVE-2020-15604
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CW...
CVE-2020-24560
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CW...
CVE-2020-25596
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. T...
CVE-2020-25597
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. Howeve...