Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

Guest Blog // Selected Security Content Provided By Sophos
What's This?
9/3/2009
07:12 AM
Graham Cluley
Graham Cluley
Security Insights
50%
50%

Did Snow Leopard Downgrade Your Adobe Flash, Security Too?

If you upgraded your Mac to run Snow Leopard, then you would be wise to double-check that it's still protected against security vulnerabilities.

If you upgraded your Mac to run Snow Leopard, then you would be wise to double-check that it's still protected against security vulnerabilities.After all, the last thing you would expect when you upgrade your operating system is that part of your security is downgraded without your knowledge.

But that's exactly what's happening with Mac OS X Snow Leopard and Adobe Flash.

As I explained on my blog on the Sophos Website, I was feeling pretty pleased with myself, obeying all of the rules and keeping my installation of Flash up-to-date. (At the time of writing the latest version is 10.0.32.18.)

So you can imagine my surprise when after installing Snow Leopard I discovered I had been downgraded to an earlier Flash version (10.0.23.1) containing security vulnerabilities -- and without a word of warning from Apple.

If you don't know which version of Adobe Flash you are running on your computer, then visit Adobe's Website and let the company perform a quick test.

In fact, Adobe will not only tell you which version of Flash you are running, but it will also tell you what version you should be running. And, of course, download the latest version directly from here.

There's an important lesson to be learned: Whenever you install a service pack or (in this case) an operating system upgrade, make sure to spend the time double-checking it hasn't secretly adjusted your security settings or rolled back some of your software.

A few minutes spent investigating that you still have all of your patches in place could save you a lot of heartache in the future.

Graham Cluley is senior technology consultant at Sophos, and has been working in the computer security field since the early 1990s. When he's not updating his other blog on the Sophos website, you can find him on Twitter at @gcluley. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Microsoft Patches Wormable RCE Vulns in Remote Desktop Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/13/2019
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
GitHub Named in Capital One Breach Lawsuit
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15150
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
In the OAuth2 Client extension before 0.4 for MediaWiki, a CSRF vulnerability exists due to the OAuth2 state parameter not being checked in the callback function.
CVE-2017-18550
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in drivers/scsi/aacraid/commctrl.c in the Linux kernel before 4.13. There is potential exposure of kernel stack memory because aac_get_hba_info does not initialize the hbainfo structure.
CVE-2017-18551
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c in the Linux kernel before 4.14.15. There is an out of bounds write in the function i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated.
CVE-2017-18552
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in net/rds/af_rds.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11. There is an out of bounds write and read in the function rds_recv_track_latency.
CVE-2018-20976
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in fs/xfs/xfs_super.c in the Linux kernel before 4.18. A use after free exists, related to xfs_fs_fill_super failure.