Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

8/19/2010
11:52 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

What Storage Is Best For Server Virtualization?

One of the biggest challenges to expanding a virtual server infrastructure is dealing with the storage challenges that often come with the deployment. The way storage is used in the virtual infrastructure is unlike most use cases. In this environment we want the same storage area to be accessed by almost every connecting server and each of those servers may have dozens of workloads trying to access that storage at the same time.

One of the biggest challenges to expanding a virtual server infrastructure is dealing with the storage challenges that often come with the deployment. The way storage is used in the virtual infrastructure is unlike most use cases. In this environment we want the same storage area to be accessed by almost every connecting server and each of those servers may have dozens of workloads trying to access that storage at the same time.When deciding what storage is best for server virtualization many vendors try to isolate down to a single capability that their storage happens to have that makes their product the best storage platform for the virtualized environment. One area of this discussion is often on what protocol to use. Your choices typically are iSCSI, Fibre Channel or NAS. In addition there are newer options coming out, shared SAS and ATA over Ethernet (AoE) are two examples. The choice you make can allow for that shared everything world to be more easily implemented. As we discuss in our recent article "VMware Storage Simplification Strategies" protocol selection is important and depending on the environment may be a key issue for consideration, but the protocol is just one of the decision points.

The capabilities of the system itself are critical. There are two capabilities to look for here. The first is its ability to adapt and scale to meet the unpredictable workload demands and rapid growth that is typical to virtualized environments. Almost every virtualized server environment we have been involved with sees virtual server count grow rapidly and often well beyond the initial projections. This impacts storage by requiring more capacity and I/O bandwidth. An ideal storage selection should be able to handle that growth without having to force you into a premature upgrade or the addition of a second storage platform. Either way life will become more complicated.

The second capability is how simple does the storage system itself make things? You can select a protocol that you are comfortable with, and a system that can handle all of the server growth you can possibly foresee, but if the system does not make the management of storage easy it will cause problems for you in the environment. This goes beyond the data services that most people immediately think of; snapshots, replication etc... Your storage systems will either have them or not, and if it doesn't the hypervisor can handle it.

The storage system can make life easy for you by handling key storage management challenges not just data services. For example how easy is it to add additional storage capacity? This is critical in a virtual environment since the likelihood of needing more capacity is high. Also this is more than just how do you connect that new storage but how hard is it to make that storage available to existing volumes or to map it into the virtual infrastructure? Another example is how does the storage system allow you to manage different classes of storage and map those to the appropriate virtual machines? Is there an automated data movement function or is there a simple way to identify virtual machines that need more or less performance and move those to the corresponding tier?

Selecting the right storage strategy for virtual environments is more than picking the right protocol. The capabilities of the storage system itself play an important role in deciding if you will be buried in storage management tasks or be free to focus on other responsibilities.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-22199
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
SQL Injection vulnerability in phpCMS 2007 SP6 build 0805 via the digg_mod parameter to digg_add.php.
CVE-2020-22200
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Directory Traversal vulnerability in phpCMS 9.1.13 via the q parameter to public_get_suggest_keyword.
CVE-2020-22201
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
phpCMS 2008 sp4 allowas remote malicious users to execute arbitrary php commands via the pagesize parameter to yp/product.php.
CVE-2021-20483
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591.
CVE-2021-20488
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 could allow an authenticated malicious user to change the passowrds of other users in the Windows AD enviornemnt when IBM Security Identity Manager Windows Password Synch Plug-in is deployed and configured. IBM X-Force ID: 197789.