Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

6/15/2009
09:12 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Solving Storage Performance Problems

When an application is slowing down because of poor storage I/O performance, the first step most IT professionals will take to solve the problem is to increase the physical drive count on the RAID group assigned to that application. How do you know when this will work and what are the best ways to implement this?

When an application is slowing down because of poor storage I/O performance, the first step most IT professionals will take to solve the problem is to increase the physical drive count on the RAID group assigned to that application. How do you know when this will work and what are the best ways to implement this?Adding drive count only works if there are enough storage I/O requests coming from the application to keep each drive spindle busy; this is often measured as queue depth. Adding drives to address performance problems is no different then adding CPU's and multiple cores to increase processing performance. As long as your application has enough threads to keep the cores busy, performance increases. Without theses threads, multiple cores don't help all that much, that's why in the past it was common to hear a vendor say they would rather have fewer faster processors than many slower ones.

In storage we either need to scale up the response time of the drives or scale out the number of drives to handle more simultaneous responses. In the scale up model we have hit a wall (15k RPM drives) in how fast drives can respond and that is why Solid State Disk Technology is becoming popular. The scale out model, adding more drives, has become popular because there are plenty of applications that can provide the number of I/O requests to keep a fleet of drives busy.

Any data center that has a server virtualization project going full steam is a candidate. With today's server processing power, a single virtualization host can house 20-30 virtual machines. Each of these will generate varying degrees of random I/O requests, extended to a 5 to 10 node cluster of virtual hosts and you can easily get to hundreds of virtual machines all demanding something from the host.

Whether it is a multi-threaded database application, server virtualization, or thousands of online users accessing the same files, the challenge, as we discuss in our article "What's Causing the I/O Bottleneck?" is that as these environments scale out, adding more drives eventually exhausts the performance capabilities of the storage controllers. That's why you see so many systems that max out performance at about 50% of the spindle count. At that point adding drives is a case of diminishing returns.

The solution for this problem is twofold. One option is to move to a solution that can scale well beyond the common two node or two head storage platform, often called Clustered Storage solutions. These systems, like those offered by 3PAR or Isilon Systems can add storage processing and bandwidth as capacity increases. Another option is moving to a separate Solid State Disk like those offered by Texas Memory Systems or Violin Memory that can essentially eliminate response time. Both options have their merits and should be explored to see what is the best fit for your data center.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Microsoft to Officially End Support for Windows 7, Server 2008
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-7227
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
Westermo MRD-315 1.7.3 and 1.7.4 devices have an information disclosure vulnerability that allows an authenticated remote attacker to retrieve the source code of different functions of the web application via requests that lack certain mandatory parameters. This affects ifaces-diag.asp, system.asp, ...
CVE-2019-15625
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A memory usage vulnerability exists in Trend Micro Password Manager 3.8 that could allow an attacker with access and permissions to the victim's memory processes to extract sensitive information.
CVE-2019-19696
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A RootCA vulnerability found in Trend Micro Password Manager for Windows and macOS exists where the localhost.key of RootCA.crt might be improperly accessed by an unauthorized party and could be used to create malicious self-signed SSL certificates, allowing an attacker to misdirect a user to phishi...
CVE-2019-19697
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products which could allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges and tamper with protected services by disabling or otherwise preventing them to start. An attacker must already have administr...
CVE-2019-20357
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A Persistent Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability exists in the Trend Micro Security 2020 (v160 and 2019 (v15) consumer familiy of products which could potentially allow an attacker the ability to create a malicious program to escalate privileges and attain persistence on a vulnerable system.