Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

3/3/2010
10:58 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Is Out-Year Maintenance Really Motivation?

At some point in the next few years, maybe this year, you are going to switch storage vendors. In the industry we use terms like refresh your storage instead of switch. Sounds less painful. In my blog over at Network Computing I spoke about how you need to be careful of the actual migration of data and who is going to do it. A common motivation to switch is the cost of out-year mai

At some point in the next few years, maybe this year, you are going to switch storage vendors. In the industry we use terms like refresh your storage instead of switch. Sounds less painful. In my blog over at Network Computing I spoke about how you need to be careful of the actual migration of data and who is going to do it. A common motivation to switch is the cost of out-year maintenance.Out-year maintenance is a bill you get when the storage system you bought comes out of the initial service coverage that was included when you purchased the unit. In some ways this is the best case scenario for replacement. You have reached the end of the maintenance cycle for the system but at least this means you received four to five years of service out of the system. The downside is the shock at the cost of the first out-of-warranty maintenance bill and realizing its almost cheaper to buy a new system. Really these bills should come with a defibrillator.

We all know what the strategy is here on the part of the supplier, that you will use this as motivation to get a new storage system. I'm just not sure why suppliers are so convinced that you will buy it from them though. If your storage system has performed flawlessly then I can see you giving the incumbent the advantage, but almost every IT Manager I've spoken with in this situation will open the field up to at least a few other suppliers to see what has changed in the last few years. These out-year maintenance bills can be so extreme that sometimes the response to them is for the customer to do everything they can not to buy that system again.

I think most suppliers don't factor in the total cost of retention of your business when this happens. Instead what should be an upgrade essentially becomes a battle for a new customer. New customer aquizition is very costly for suppliers. There are sales calls to be made, competitive pricing to come up with and of course plenty of lunches and golf outings. Wouldn't the incumbent supplier be better served by offering you a maintenance contract that is more incremental in nature? The IT Managers I know expect out-year maintenance to cost more, they just didn't expect for it to require a trip to the hospital. Besides services revenue is a good thing, keeping customers is a good thing. This seems more cost effective to me.

There could be concern that you will try to get ten years out of the system. I don't get that either. This is technology. You know you need to stay competitive. The IT Managers I speak with that are frustrated by the bills they get for out-year maintenance readily admit they were going to upgrade the system soon anyway. They were often just looking to get another year or two out of their current one. If the vendor would have just maintained them at a reasonable price they would have been able to enjoy more of the advantages of being the incumbent.

Maintenance is just one reason to switch vendors, there are others, and we'll explore those in our next entry.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
News
US Formally Attributes SolarWinds Attack to Russian Intelligence Agency
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  4/15/2021
News
Dependency Problems Increase for Open Source Components
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  4/14/2021
News
FBI Operation Remotely Removes Web Shells From Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/14/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3035
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-20
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability in Bridgecrew Checkov by Prisma Cloud allows arbitrary code execution when processing a malicious terraform file. This issue impacts Checkov 2.0 versions earlier than Checkov 2.0.26. Checkov 1.0 versions are not impacted.
CVE-2021-3036
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-20
An information exposure through log file vulnerability exists in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software where secrets in PAN-OS XML API requests are logged in cleartext to the web server logs when the API is used incorrectly. This vulnerability applies only to PAN-OS appliances that are configured to us...
CVE-2021-3037
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-20
An information exposure through log file vulnerability exists in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software where the connection details for a scheduled configuration export are logged in system logs. Logged information includes the cleartext username, password, and IP address used to export the PAN-OS conf...
CVE-2021-3038
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-20
A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app on Windows systems allows a limited Windows user to send specifically-crafted input to the GlobalProtect app that results in a Windows blue screen of death (BSOD) error. This issue impacts: GlobalProtect app 5.1 versions...
CVE-2021-3506
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-19
An out-of-bounds (OOB) memory access flaw was found in fs/f2fs/node.c in the f2fs module in the Linux kernel in versions before 5.12.0-rc4. A bounds check failure allows a local attacker to gain access to out-of-bounds memory leading to a system crash or a leak of internal kernel information. The hi...