Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

3/3/2010
10:58 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Is Out-Year Maintenance Really Motivation?

At some point in the next few years, maybe this year, you are going to switch storage vendors. In the industry we use terms like refresh your storage instead of switch. Sounds less painful. In my blog over at Network Computing I spoke about how you need to be careful of the actual migration of data and who is going to do it. A common motivation to switch is the cost of out-year mai

At some point in the next few years, maybe this year, you are going to switch storage vendors. In the industry we use terms like refresh your storage instead of switch. Sounds less painful. In my blog over at Network Computing I spoke about how you need to be careful of the actual migration of data and who is going to do it. A common motivation to switch is the cost of out-year maintenance.Out-year maintenance is a bill you get when the storage system you bought comes out of the initial service coverage that was included when you purchased the unit. In some ways this is the best case scenario for replacement. You have reached the end of the maintenance cycle for the system but at least this means you received four to five years of service out of the system. The downside is the shock at the cost of the first out-of-warranty maintenance bill and realizing its almost cheaper to buy a new system. Really these bills should come with a defibrillator.

We all know what the strategy is here on the part of the supplier, that you will use this as motivation to get a new storage system. I'm just not sure why suppliers are so convinced that you will buy it from them though. If your storage system has performed flawlessly then I can see you giving the incumbent the advantage, but almost every IT Manager I've spoken with in this situation will open the field up to at least a few other suppliers to see what has changed in the last few years. These out-year maintenance bills can be so extreme that sometimes the response to them is for the customer to do everything they can not to buy that system again.

I think most suppliers don't factor in the total cost of retention of your business when this happens. Instead what should be an upgrade essentially becomes a battle for a new customer. New customer aquizition is very costly for suppliers. There are sales calls to be made, competitive pricing to come up with and of course plenty of lunches and golf outings. Wouldn't the incumbent supplier be better served by offering you a maintenance contract that is more incremental in nature? The IT Managers I know expect out-year maintenance to cost more, they just didn't expect for it to require a trip to the hospital. Besides services revenue is a good thing, keeping customers is a good thing. This seems more cost effective to me.

There could be concern that you will try to get ten years out of the system. I don't get that either. This is technology. You know you need to stay competitive. The IT Managers I speak with that are frustrated by the bills they get for out-year maintenance readily admit they were going to upgrade the system soon anyway. They were often just looking to get another year or two out of their current one. If the vendor would have just maintained them at a reasonable price they would have been able to enjoy more of the advantages of being the incumbent.

Maintenance is just one reason to switch vendors, there are others, and we'll explore those in our next entry.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20327
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A specific version of the Node.js mongodb-client-encryption module does not perform correct validation of the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in interception of traffic between the Node....
CVE-2021-20328
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Specific versions of the Java driver that support client-side field level encryption (CSFLE) fail to perform correct host name verification on the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in inte...
CVE-2020-27543
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
The restify-paginate package 0.0.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to cause a Denial-of-Service by omitting the HTTP Host header. A Restify-based web service would crash with an uncaught exception.
CVE-2020-23534
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.
CVE-2021-27330
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Triconsole Datepicker Calendar <3.77 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in calendar_form.php. Attackers can read authentication cookies that are still active, which can be used to perform further attacks such as reading browser history, directory listings, and file contents.