Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

6/3/2011
12:08 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

How To Design A 100 Year Data Retention Strategy

A cost effective hardware strategy is only the first step, a process and software strategy is vital to identifying for retention and moving it from primary storage.

100 years is a long time to retain anything let alone electronic data. While not everyone needs to retain data for that long, most organizations have retention needs at least in the seven to 10 year range. Most modern storage systems, however, are not designed to last more than five years, so how to create a storage strategy that can retain data for more than a century?

There are two components to a 100-year retention strategy. The first is to develop a hardware strategy that can cost effectively store that data for the next 100 years. The second is to develop a software and process strategy that will identify and move data to the retention storage area, ideally removing it from primary storage. I believe we need to be driving toward a data center where primary storage is small, fast, and only used for the most active set of data. Even at today's prices, many environments could be solid-state storage only for their primary tier.

I am specifically avoiding calling this storage area an archive tier. Using the term archive implies that this data will be moved to the archive, never to be accessed again. Thanks to initiatives like analytics, litigation management, and compliance, this data will be accessed and the system needs to be able to deliver that data in a timely manner relative to its age and no matter what all the data needs to be easily found.

This does not mean though that the disk tier needs to be disk only. I struggle with how organizations are going to afford to be able to keep 100 years of data on spinning disk. I don’t think all the power management and deduplication in the world is not going to make 100 years of disk only retention a reality. Additionally tape has overcome some of its challenges when it comes to use as a long term archive specifically in the form of the Long Term File System (LTFS) as we discuss in our article "What is LTFS?". The answer for the retention storage area is going to be a mixture of tape and disk.

The disk component needs to be a scaleable infrastructure where nodes of storage can be added to the disk area. More importantly, as we describe in our recent article "Building Affordable, Scalable Storage Infrastructures", these scaleable designs need to support mixed node types. This means nodes of varying disk capacity and processor types but still acting as one within the cluster. This is important because it allows for a rolling migration of storage nodes as equipment ages. Meaning that, over time, you can add new nodes with the latest processors and storage while at the same time gradually deactivating older nodes. This allows you to upgrade the cluster but not have to do a massive data migration, which, depending on the archive, may be almost impossible because of the capacity of the storage area.

The size of the disk component of this retention tier though should be kept at a reasonable level for what you need. Analytics (Big Data) will need to be larger because of the amount of data that needs to be scanned. Compliance and other forms of retention areas can have smaller disk areas but will still be large in comparison to primary storage. The fact that scale out systems can potentially scale to hundreds of nodes does not mean that you want to power, cool, and protect hundreds of nodes. At some point, and I know the disk guys won't like this, you really do need to push to tape. In the past, I have advocated for a disk only repository but LTFS in large part changes all that. I’ll explain why and how to use tape in this 100 year retention strategy in our next entry.

Follow Storage Switzerland on Twitter

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.