Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


12:27 PM
George Crump
George Crump

Do You Need Unified Storage?

As discussed in our last entry, unified storage is all the rage right now in the storage industry; it is essentiality the combining of NAS with a block protocol, like iSCSI or traditional fibre channel. The question is however do you need unified storage?

As discussed in our last entry, unified storage is all the rage right now in the storage industry; it is essentiality the combining of NAS with a block protocol, like iSCSI or traditional fibre channel. The question is however do you need unified storage?The answer is you should do everything that you can to drive down the cost to deploy and more importantly manage storage while at the same time maintaining the storage IO performance that your environment needs.

If you are going to have relatively balanced storage needs between the two service types (SAN and NAS) then it makes sense to look at unified storage. Unified storage implies that it will simplify storage management by having a single platform to deploy storage services (NAS or SAN) from. The area to look at in unified storage is how well the two services are integrated and does that really make it easier for you? Companies like SUN, NetApp, ONStor and Nexenta have all done a good job in providing a relatively smooth user experience.

Presenting unified storage as easier to use implies that managing two separate storage platforms is inherently harder. Many SAN systems are very easy to use now as are most NAS systems. Unless you are looking to unified storage as your first step into shared storage or if you have shared storage you can replace most of it with a unified solution, I don't see an inherent gain in ease of use by a unified system. While ease of use is there, it is also there in modern SAN or NAS only systems, so don't judge unified storage by ease of use alone. There is more to it.

The second area to look at is to make sure the unified system can sustain your performance requirements. If you are going to have a need to provide both SAN and NAS equally and have relatively modest performance requirements then the simplicity of the single platform may work in your favor. Understanding the performance requirements is critical. Many unified vendors also offer non-unified block focused storage systems for a reason, to address customers that need the higher-end performance of pure block based fibre channel SAN storage. Make sure you are comfortable with both the block I/O and file I/O performance of the unified system.

As always there are exceptions, and some vendors will claim that their unified block I/O performs as well as a non-unified block I/O system and it may be for your environment, just test it.

There comes a time when a focused storage system that specializes on block I/O or file I/O is a better fit. This can occur when your environment becomes heavily saturated with one of those storage services (SAN or NAS) and especially when there are immediate performance issues or long term scalability concerns. Companies like 3PAR and Isilon have made their mark by offering storage solutions that are designed to address performance and scalability while at the same time maintaining ease of use. As we discuss in our article "Searching for High Performance Storage" the need for high performance storage I/O is no longer limited to the lunatic fringe. Even SSD systems like those from Texas Memory or Violin Memory can be considered, non-unified storage and are clearly focused on solving a storage performance bottleneck.

The final area to explore with unified storage is to see if there is a significant cost savings. Basically can you deploy a single system that meets your performance demands and your storage services need at significantly lower price point? Especially in the mid-sized market this may be unified storage's key advantage. Most mid-sized organization simply can not muster the storage I/O performance to push todays storage systems anywhere close to their limits. It is simply more economical to have a single storage system do more than one task, potentially providing unified storage solutions a price advantage in this market.

To net it out, unified storage should be considered if you have mainstream performance requirements, a fairly balanced need of NAS and SAN services and if there is a compelling price advantage.

In our next entry we will explore another form of unified storage; virtualization appliances that can manage and unify multiple vendors storage hardware.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
minerstat msOS before 2019-10-23 does not have a unique SSH key for each instance of the product.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
IBM DB2 High Performance Unload load for LUW 6.1 and 6.5 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an untrusted search path vulnerability. By using a executable file, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. IBM X-For...
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1 allows Local File Inclusion (LFI), a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-15931. This leads to unauthenticated code execution.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Cacti through 1.2.7 is affected by multiple instances of lib/functions.php unsafe deserialization of user-controlled data to populate arrays. An authenticated attacker could use this to influence object data values and control actions taken by Cacti or potentially cause memory corruption in the PHP ...
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
An issue was discovered in Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1. An flaw in the encryption implementation exists, allowing for all encrypted data stored within the database to be decrypted.